Vol. 31 No. 4 (1983)
Research Article

Should Henrietta be Punished or Rewarded? The Effects of Name Desirability on Responsibility Attribution and Sanction Assignment

PDF
  • S. Gray Garwood,
  • Jefferson L. Sulzer,
  • Douglas W. Levine,
  • Lewis Cox,
  • Valerie Kaplan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.1983.31.4.318

Published 1983-12-01

Copyright (c) 1983 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated effects of first name desirability on both attribution of responsibility (AR) and sanction assignment (AS) to assess the generality of name bias effects on the attribution process. Subjects (n = 112) were equally divided by sex, and randomly assigned to four groups which received stimulus stories with all male or all female actors. The stories represented three of Heider's levels with high magnitude positive or negative outcomes produced by male or female actors with desirable or undesirable first names.

Analysis of AR ratings revealed significant main effects for both Level (L) and Outcome (0) as well as a significant L x 0 interaction; no significant main effects or interactions involving subjects’ sex or actor's sex (A) or name (Na) were revealed, although there was an Lx Na trend (p = .07). For AS, significant main effects were found for L, 0, and name desirability (Na). Significant two-(S × A, Lx 0), and (L × Na) and three-way (L × 0 × Sand Lx 0 × Na) interactions were found. Evidence of the effect of name desirability on AS is provided by the significant main effects for name desirability and by the L × Na interaction and by the L × 0 × Na interaction. Punishment ratings exceeded reward ratings, and significantly less reward was assigned to male actors with undesirable names and significantly less punishment was assigned to female actors with undesirable names, implying that perhaps a cognitive factor is involved, generating a type of gender appropriate leniency effect. These data also indicate that the impact of name desirability is limited primarily to subjective judgmental areas and can be weakened by focusing upon objective features of causal evidence and target's behavior.

PDF

References

  1. Garwood, S. G. and Habif, V. Children’s physical attractiveness and first-name as determinants of adult punitiveness. Unpublished Manuscript, Tulane University, 1978.
  2. Leirer, V. O., DePetris, J., Speciale, D., and Jansen, R. Common names and their importance in person perception. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual meeting, San Francisco, 1978.
  3. McDavid, J. W., & Garwood, S. G. “Teachers’ stereotypes of names: Antecedents in personality, training, and experience.” Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, 1974.
  4. Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., and Walster, G. W. “Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 173–189.
  5. Dion, K. K. “Physical attractiveness and evaluations of children’s transgressions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 207–213.
  6. Dion, K. K. “Children’s physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of adult punitiveness.” Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 772–778.
  7. Duffy, J. C., & Ridinger, B. “Stereotyped connotations of masculine and feminine names.” Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 25–34.
  8. Efran, M. “The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task”. Journal of Research in Personality, 1974, 8, 45–54.
  9. Garwood, S. G. “First-name Stereotypes as a factor in self-concept and school achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 482–487.
  10. Garwood, S. G., Baer, S., Levine, D., Carroll, S., O’Neal, E. “Sex role expectations of socially desirable first-names.” Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 257–262.
  11. Garwood, S. G., Cox, L., and Kaplan, V., Wasserman, N., and Sulzer, J. “Beauty is only “Name” deep: The effect of first-name on ratings of physical attraction.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1980, 10, 431–435.
  12. Harari, H., and McDavid, J. W. “Name stereotypes and teachers’ expectations.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 222–225.
  13. Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  14. Klinger, E., Albaum, A., and Hetherington, M. “Factors influencing the severity of moral judgments.” Journal of Social Psychology, 1964, 63, 319–326.
  15. Landy, D., & Aronson, E. “The influence of the character of the criminal and his victem on the decisions of simulated jurors. ” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141–152.
  16. Lawson, E. D. “Semantic differential analysis of men’s first names.” Journal of Psychology, 1971, 78, 229–240.
  17. McDavid J. W., and Harari, H. “Stereotyping of names and popularity in grade school children.” Child Development, 1966, 37, 453–459.
  18. Miller, A. G. “Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation.” Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 241–243.
  19. Rich, J. “Effects of children’s attractiveness on teacher’s evaluations.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 599–609.
  20. Rickel, A. U., & Anderson, L. R. “Name ambiguity and androgyny.” Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 1057–1066.
  21. Seligman, C., Paschall, N., and Takata, G. “Effects of physical attractiveness on attribution of responsibility.” Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1974, 6, 290–296.
  22. Shaw, M. E., Briscoe, M. E., and Garcia-Esteve, J. “A cross-cultural study of attribution of responsibility.” International Journal of Psychology, 1968, 3, 51–60.
  23. Shaw, M. E., and Sulzer, J. L. “An empirical test of Heider’s levels in attribution of responsibility,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 39–46.
  24. Sulzer, J. L. Attribution of responsibility as a function of the structure, quality, and intensity of the event. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Florida, 1964. (University Microfilms No. 64–13, 205).
  25. Sulzer, J. L. and Burglass, R. K. “Responsibility attribution, empathy, and punitiveness.” Journal of Personality, 1968, 36, 272–282.
  26. Tedeschi, J. & Lindskold, S. Social psychology: Interdependence, interaction, and influences. New York: John Wiley, 1976.