Vol. 47 No. 3 (1999)
Research Article

Metadata for South African Geographic Names Databases

PDF
  • Lucie Alida Möller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.1999.47.3.297

Published 1999-09-01

Copyright (c) 1999 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

The relevance of adequate information on digital datasets of geographic names is being recognized world-wide. During the development of the geographic names databases of the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) it was found that descriptive background information or metadata on such databases is lacking in South Africa. The HSRC databases are discussed here in relation to the standards set to such databases, and to some of the problems of defining the information fields and technical issues of developing such large databases in digital format. Furthermore, the advantages of descriptive metadata relating to common data standards are explored in this context. Finally, reference is made to the formulation of a policy or framework for the South African context that would set the parameters to promote the optimal use of these datasets.

PDF

References

  1. Abbot, J. 1997. “From Tangled Web to Fixed Framework. The Data Debate.” Geoinformation Africa, Issue 2: 12–13
  2. Barr, R. 1998. “Time to Blow the Whistle.” GIS Europe. August 1998.
  3. Bassole, A. 1998. “African Answers to Global Question.” Geoinformation Africa. Issue 4:18–20.
  4. Britz, J.J. 1998. “An Ethical Perspective on the Right of Access to Information.” Metadata-infoBulletin, vol.7 (2), May: 15–22.
  5. De Vries, W. T. 1998. “Access v. Protection. The Data Debate.” Geoinformation Africa. Issue 5: 16–18.
  6. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1994. Content Standards for Digital Spatial Metadata. (June 8, draft). Federal Geographic Data Committee. Washington DC.
  7. Marsden, R., et al. 1998. Report of the Working Group on Toponymie Data Exchange Formats and Standards. UNGEGN: New York.
  8. Nienaber, G.S. & Raper, P.E. 1997, 1981. Toponymica Hottentotica, 3 vols. Pretoria: HSRC.
  9. Orth, D. 1986a. “Principles, Policies and Procedures: Domestic Geographic Names. “ In: United Nations Department of Technical Co-operation for Development,World Cartography, Vol XVIII, New York.
  10. Orth, D. 1986b. “Guidelines for Establishing a National Geographical Names Authority and Planning a Standardization Programme.” In: United Nations Department of Technical Co-operation for Development,World Cartography, Vol. XVIII, New York.
  11. Payne, R. 1995. “Development and Implementation of the National Geographical Names Database.” Names 43(4): 307–314.
  12. Randall, R., et. al. 1992. Gazetteer of South Africa: Names Approved by the United States Board on Geographic Names. Vol I-IV, Second Edition. Washington DC: Defense Mapping Agency.
  13. Raper, P.E. 1989. “Problems of Toponymie Standardization in the Republic of South Africa. “ Nomina Africana, 3(1): 77–88.
  14. Raper, P.E. 1996. United Nations Documents on Geographical Names. Pretoria: Names Research Institute.
  15. Raper, P.E. 1997. “Toponymie Guidelines for Map and Other Editors - South Africa (Revised).” Sixth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names, Vol II. Technical Papers. New York, 25 August - 3 September 1992. New York: United Nations, 279–294.
  16. Svensson, B. 1997. Search SAM - Southern African Metadata Consortium, Geographic Information Management Systems, Metadata: Web & References, http://www.gims.com/metadata/implementations.html
  17. Stadler, C. 1998a. “Data for the Nation.” Geoinformation Africa. Issue 4: 34–35.
  18. Stadler, C. 1998b. “Playing South Africa’s Data Game.” Geoinformation Africa. Issue 4: 30–32.
  19. Smith, Grant. 1992. “Describing Types of Placenames Information. “ Names, 40(4): 299–306.
  20. United Nations. 1991/1992. Resolutions Adopted at the Six United Nations Conferences on the Standardization of Geographical Names, 1967, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987. 1992. Prepared for the United Nations by the Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names.
  21. United Nations. 1998. Resolutions of the 7th United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names. New York, UN Plaza: ECOSOC. Resolution 7/6: Toponymie data exchange formats and standards. Resolution 7/9: Standardization of geographical names utilizing the Internet.
  22. United Nations. Economic and Social Council. 1998. United Nations Conferences on the Standardization of Geographical Names. 1998. Working Papers: No. E/Conf.91/L.43: Toponymie Websites: Accessing Canada’s Geographical Names on the Internet, 26 November 1997.
  23. Van Helden, P. 1997. “Data Acquisition, Finding Data.” Diploma in GIS, Module 5, CBPDGIS, 85–103. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
  24. Van Brakel, P. and M. Pienaar 1997. “Geographic Information Systems: How a World Wide Web Presence Can Improve Their Availability. “ Electronic Library. Journals in Education (CIJE) / October. 15(2): 109–116