Vol. 48 No. 2 (2000)
Research Article

Toponymy of Climbing Space: Names Within the Polish Climbing Community

Published 2000-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Social groups create social space from geographic space in ways which are useful to their members. The nature of the social space can be approached through the names which are used to define it. A study of the names in the “climbing space” created by Polish climbers shows that they are used in ways which are meaningful only within the context of climbing and they serve to express group values and to promote group solidarity.

References

  1. Ainiala, Terhi. 1998. “On Defining the Proper Name and the Place Name.” Nicolaisen, 43–48.
  2. Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. “La production de l’espace.” Paris: Anthropos.
  3. Matuszyk, Andrzej. 1998. “Humanistyczne podstawy teorii sportöw przestrzeni (na przykladzie alpinizmu).” Krakow: AWF.
  4. Millward, Celia and Richard Millward. 1984. “Ski-Trail Names: A New Toponymie Category.” Names 32:191–217.
  5. Nicolaisen, W.F.H., ed. 1998. Proceedings of the XlXth International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Aberdeen: U of Aberdeen.
  6. Rymut, Kazimierz, ed. 1982. Proceedings of the Xlllth International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Warszawa-Krakow: PWN.
  7. Sramek, Rudolf. 1982. “Das onymische und das appellativische Objekt.” Rymut, 503–11.
  8. Recent Theses and Dissertations of Onomastic Interest
  9. Alderman, Derek Hilton. Creating a New Geography of Memory in the South: The Politics of (Re)naming Streets After Martin Luther King, Jr. Dissertation, U of Georgia,1998. “(Re)naming streets after King represents one of the most widespread...of the South’s new geographies of memory.”
  10. Clankie, Shawn Michael. On Brand Name Change: A Theory of Genericization. Dissertation, U of Hawaii,1999. “[G]enericization will occur in novel semantic classes..., the shorter the brand name in relation to the class-noun, the greater the likelihood for genericization, [and]...for a brand name to become generic there must be an association to a single product.”
  11. D’Cruz, Mark John. Names as Disguised Descriptions. Dissertation, Rutgers U, 1998. “[0]rdinary proper names such as ‘Aristotle’ might be satisfactorily viewed as ordinary definite descriptions in disguise.... [A]n ordinary proper name is a type of ‘dummy’ expression which does nothing.. .except await replacement by any one.. .of a range of co-denoting definite descriptions.”
  12. Hunt, Anne Jude. Talking About What Does Not Exist: A Semantics of Radical Reference Failure. Dissertation, U of Virginia, 1998. “[N]on-referring names, commonly thought to have no semantic content, do indeed have such content: sentences containing such names can have determinate truth conditions....”
  13. Lambert, Aaron. Proper Names. Thesis, Queen’s U, Kingston, 1997. [The solution to the problem of the meaning of proper names of Russell, Frege, Mill, Strawson and Kripke are explored and found inadequate].
  14. Meredig, John S. Russian Bird Names: A Linguistic Analysis. Dissertation,U of Illinois, Urbana, 1997. “[S]emantic categories contain names motivated by sound, appearance, behavior, habitat, temporal associations and affective and folkloric associations.... The process of univerbation...play[s] an important role in the [morphological] formation of Russian bird names.”
  15. Porter, Trevor. The Place-Names of Trinity Bay, Newfoundland: A Syntactic Analysis. Thesis, Memorial U of Newfoundland,1999. [Categorizes and discusses the grammatical patterns of the 102 community names collected].