Vol. 50 No. 4 (2002)
Research Article

Long Term Trends in the Frequencies of Given Names

PDF
  • Douglas A. Galbi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2002.50.4.275

Published 2002-12-01

Copyright (c) 2002 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

The frequency distributions of personal given names offer important insights into the nature of the information economy. Here I present data on the popularity of the most frequent personal given names in the United Kingdom over the past millennium. The data show that the popularity of names, like the popularity of other symbols and artifacts associated with the information economy, can be usefully viewed as a power law. The frequency distribution of personal names, graphed as the logarithm of name popularity against the logarithm of name popularity rank, is similar to other popularity distributions where people and organizations are free to create and choose among many collections of symbols used in a similar way. Naming is seen to be representative of more general patterns of behavior in the information economy. Furthermore, the data suggest that historically distinctive changes in the information economy occurred in conjunction with the Industrial Revolution.

PDF

References

  1. Adamic, Lada A., and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2000. “The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web.” Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1: 5–12. Also available online at http://www.parc.xerox. com/istl/groups/iea/abstracts/ECommerce/webmarkets.html.
  2. Barlow, Frank, Martin Biddle, Olof von Feilitzen, and D. J. Keene. 1976. Winchester in the Early Middle Ages: An Edition and Discussion of the Winton Domesday. With contributions from T.J. Brown, H. M. Nixon, and Francis Wormald. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Chung, Kee H., and Raymond A. K. Cox. 1994. “A Stochastic Model of Superstardom: An Application of the Yule Distribution.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 771–75.
  4. Clark, Cecily. 1992. “Onomastics.” The Cambridge History of the English Language, 1066-1476. Vol. II. Ed. Richard M. Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  5. Ekwall, Eilert, ed. 1951. Two Early London Subsidy Rolls. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.
  6. Eshel, Amram. 2001. “On the Frequency Distribution of First Names.” Names 49: 55–60.
  7. Gabaix, Xavier. 1999. “Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Explanation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 139–61.
  8. Galbi, Douglas A. 2001. “A New Account of Personalization and Effective Communication.” Available at http://www.galbithink.orgorhttp://www.ssrn.com.
  9. Genealogical Society of Utah, Federation of Family History Societies [GSU-FFHS]. 1881. Census for England and Wales, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man [computer file, SN: 3643] (Colchester, Essex.: The Data Archive [distributor], 29 July 1997).
  10. Mayhew, N. J. 1995. “Population, Money Supply, and the Velocity of Circulation in England, 1300–1700.” Economic History Review XLVIII: 238-57.
  11. Merry, Emma. 1995. First Names: The definitive guide to popular names in England and Wales 1944–1994 and in the regions 1994. (With support from Kay Callaghan and Chris Cotton). London: HMSO.
  12. Smith-Bannister, Scott. 1997. Names and Naming Patterns in England, 1538-1700. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  13. Snooks, Graeme Donald. 1995. “The Dynamic Role of the Market in the Anglo-Norman Economy and Beyond, 1086–1300.” A Commercialising Economy: England 1086 to c.1300. Eds. Richard H. Britnell and Bruce M. S. Campbell. Manchester and New York: Manchester Univ. Press.
  14. Stewart, George R. 1948. Men 's Names in Plymouth and Massachusetts in the Seventeenth Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
  15. Tucker, D. K. 2001. “Distribution of Forenames, Surnames, and Forename-Surname Pairs in the United States.” Names 49: 69–96.
  16. Tucker, D. K. 2002. “Distribution of Forenames, Surnames, and Forename-Surname Pairs in Canada.” Names 50: 105–132.