Vol. 55 No. 4 (2007)
Research Article

Proper Names as the Prototypical Nominal Category

PDF
  • Willy Van Langendonck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2007.55.4.437

Published 2007-12-01

Copyright (c) 2007 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

Proper names are the prototypical, unmarked nouns; they refer rather than describe or predicate as do common nouns. Proper names systematically appear in close appositional structures of such types as the poet Burns, Hurricane Edna, Fido the dog, the City of London, where they constitute the identifying unit, while common nouns in such appositional structures characterize the name. Proper names are definite, mostly countable, singular and nonrecursive (nongeneric) and concrete; since these are the unmarked features of nouns, proper names regularly display zero or no affixes, except for marked proprial subcategories. This view· of proper names apparently contradicts the cognitivist ideas of Ronald Langacker; however, Langacker's analysis can be interpreted in such a way that proper names constitute the prototypical nominal class.

PDF

References

  1. Bayer, Joseph. 1991. “Representatie van algemene namen en eigennamen in het mentale lexicon: neurolinguistische evidentie” [“Representation of Common Nouns and Proper Names in the Mental Lexicon: Neurolinguistic Evidence”]. Tabu 21:53–66.
  2. Kripke, Saul. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Davidson, Donald, and Gilbert Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, 2nd ed. Pp. 253–355. Dordrecht/Boston.
  3. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991 .Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. P.
  4. Langacker, Ronald W. 2004. “Remarks on Nominal Grounding”. In Verstraete, Jean Christophe, ed., Grounding and Headedness in the Noun Phrase. Studies for Willy Van Langendonck. Special Issue of Functions of Language 11. Pp. 77–113.
  5. La Palme Reyes, Marie, J. MacNamara, G. E. Reyes, and H. Zolfaghari. 1993. “Proper Names and How They are Learned.” Memory 1: 433–55.
  6. Osgood, Charles E. 1971.“Where do Sentences Come From?” In Steinberg, Danny D, and Leon A. Jakobovits, eds., SemanticsiAn Interdisciplinary Reader in PhilosophyiLinguisticsiand Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P. Pp. 497–529.
  7. Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. “Human Categorization.” In Warren, Neil, ed., Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology. London: Academic P. Pp. 1–72. Searle, John. 1958. “Proper Names.” Mind 61: 166–73.
  8. Rosch, Eleanor. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P.
  9. Semenza, Carlo, and Marina Zettin. 1988. “Generating Proper Names: a Case of Selective Inability.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 5: 711–21.
  10. Ullmann, Stephen. 1962. Semantics. An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. Ullmann, Stephen. 1969. Words and their Use. London: F. Muller.
  12. Van Langendonck, Willy. 1999. “Neurolinguistic and Syntactic Evidence for Basic Level Meaning in Proper Names.” Functions of Language 6: 95–138.
  13. Van Langendonck, Willy. 2007. Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  14. Ziff, Paul. 1960. Semantic Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. P.
  15. Ziff, Paul. 1977. “About Proper Names.” Mind 86: 319–32.