Vol. 56 No. 4 (2008)
Research Article

Ethnicity and Women's Courtesy Titles: A Preliminary Report

Published 2008-12-01

Abstract

Abstract

Although numerous studies have been conducted on attitudes toward Ms. and patterns of Ms.-use since its popularization in the 1970s, few of these studies have examined ethnicity as a variable in its use. The present paper reports on a new online survey of women's courtesy titles and surname choices, focusing on the ethnicity of respondents as a predictor of their likelihood of addressing a woman with Ms. As the data include residents of both Canada and the United States, the label 'Black' is used rather than 'African American', and 'White' is then used in place of 'Caucasian', in order to have parallel ethnic labels. Preliminary results suggest a difference between Whites and Blacks in terms of likelihood of using Ms., with Blacks tending to prefer the more traditional titles Miss and Mrs. at a higher rate than Whites. However, because of uneven cell sizes and the under-representation of some ethnic groups, statistical results must be treated with caution until further data are available.

References

  1. Donna L. Atkinson, ‘Names and Titles: Maiden Name Retention and the Use of Ms.’, Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, 9 (1987), 56–83.
  2. Kenneth Dion & Albert A. Cota, ‘The Ms. Stereotype: Its Domain and the Role of Explicitness in Title Preference’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 (1991), 403–410.
  3. Kenneth Dion & Regina A. Schuller, ‘Ms. and the Manager: A Tale of Two Stereotypes’, Sex Roles, 22 (1990), 569–577.
  4. Kenneth Dion & Regina A. Schuller, ‘The Ms. Stereotype: Its Generality and Its Relation to Managerial and Marital Status Stereotypes’, Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 23 (1991), 25–40.
  5. Norman T. Feather, Mary P. O’Driscoll, & Tricia Nagel, ‘Conservatism, Sex-typing, and the Use of Titles: Miss, Mrs, or Ms?’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 9 (1979), 419–426.
  6. Janet M. Fuller, ‘The Uses and Meanings of the Female Title Ms.’, American Speech, 80 (2005), 180–206.
  7. Marsha Jacobson & William R. Insko, Jr., ‘On the Relationship Between Feminism and the Use of ‘Ms.’’, Psychological Reports, 54 (1984), 388–390.
  8. Donna L. Lillian, ‘Ms. Revisited: She’s Still a Bitch, Only Now She’s Older!’,in Papers of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association (Charlottetown, P.E.I.: Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, 1995), pp. 149–161.
  9. Donna L. Lillian, ‘Ms. as a Courtesy Title: Variation Through Time and Space’,in LACUS Forum 33: Variation, ed. by Peter Reich, William J. Sullivan, & Arle R. Lommel (Houston, TX: Linguistic Association of Canada and the US, 2007), pp. 211–218.
  10. Donna L. Lillian, ‘Social and Regional Variation in Women’s Marital Surname Choices’, in LACUS Forum 34 (Houstan, TX: Linguistic Association of Canada and the US, forthcoming)i
  11. Thomas Murray, ‘Perceptions of Ms.-titled Women: Evidence from the American Midwest’, Onomastica Canadiana, 79 (1997), 73–96.