Vol. 71 No. 3 (2023): NAMES: A Journal of Onomastics
Articles

Name Transmission Relationships in England (1838-2014)

PDF
  • Stephen J. Bush
Stephen J. Bush
University of Oxford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2023.2500

Published 2023-08-22

Keywords

  • anthroponym,
  • patronym,
  • matronym,
  • first name,
  • given name,
  • England
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2023 Stephen J. Bush

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Baby names are often used to model the mechanisms of cultural evolution, as they are not given arbitrarily but on the basis of their perceived associations. Datasets showing birth registrations over time track changes in these perceptions, and thereby in tastes and ideas. Using birth registration data, numerous transmission biases have been identified that predispose someone to favour one cultural variant (i.e., a name) over another. While this research is facilitated by the annual release of many countries’ birth registration data, these datasets are typically limited to yearly counts of forenames. To gain insight into name transmission biases not detectable from birth registration data alone, this study parses the birth, marriage, and death registers of England to generate a dataset of 690,603 name transmission relationships, given between 1838 and 2014, and linking the names of both parents and child. The data reveal long-term trends in matro- and patronymic naming, once common practices affecting approximately 15% of male and 8% of female records per year throughout the 19th century. These practices declined precipitously throughout the 20th century, in the aftermath of the First World War. These results highlight the importance of contextualising birth registration data when identifying naming trends.

PDF

References

  1. Acerbi, Alberto, Stefano Ghirlanda, and Magnus Enquist. 2012. “The Logic of Fashion Cycles”. PLOS ONE 7, no. 3: e32541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032541.
  2. Bao, Han-Wu-Shuang, Huajian Cai, Yiming Jing, and Jianxiong Wang. 2021. “Novel Evidence for the Increasing Prevalence of Unique Names in China: A Reply to Ogihara”. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 731244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731244.
  3. Bentley, R. Alexander, Matthew W. Hahn, and Stephen J. Shennan. 2004. “Random Drift and Culture Change”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, no. 1547: 1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2746.
  4. Bentley, R. Alexander, Carl P. Lipo, Harold A. Herzog, and Matthew W. Hahn. 2007. “Regular Rates of Popular Culture Change Reflect Random Copying”. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 , no. 3: 151–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.002.
  5. Bentley, R. Alexander, and Paul Ormerod. 2012. “Accelerated Innovation and Increased Spatial Diversity of US Popular Culture”. Advances in Complex Systems 15, no. 01n02: 1150011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911003232.
  6. Berger, Jonah, Eric T. Bradlow, Alex Braunstein, and Yao Zhang. 2012. “From Karen to Katie: Using Baby Names to Understand Cultural Evolution”. Psychological Science 23, no. 10: 1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443371.
  7. Berger, Jonah, and Gaël Le Mens. 2009. “How Adoption Speed Affects the Abandonment of Cultural Tastes”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no. 20: 8146–8150. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812647106.
  8. Betiang, Liwhu. 2020. “Naming and the Reconstruction of Female Identity in Bette-Obudu”. Sociolinguistic Studies 13, no. 2–4: 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.37855.
  9. Bloothooft, Gerrit, and David Onland. 2011. “Socioeconomic Determinants of First Names”. Names 59, no. 1: 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311x12942225544679.
  10. Bruning, J. L., N. K. Polinko, J. I. Zerbst, and J. T. Buckingham. 2000. “The Effect on Expected Job Success of the Connotative Meanings of Names and Nicknames”. The Journal of Social Psychology 140, no. 2: 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600459.
  11. Bush, Stephen J. 2019. “Re-using the Names of Newborns: Symbolic Reincarnation in an Age of Infant Mortality”. Names 67, no. 2: 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2018.1536186.
  12. Bush, Stephen J. 2020. "Ambivalence, Avoidance, and Appeal: Alliterative Aspects of Anglo Anthroponyms”. Names 68, no. 3: 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2020.1775471.
  13. Bush, Stephen J., Anna Powell-Smith, and Tom C. Freeman. 2018. “Network Analysis of the Social and Demographic Influences on Name Choice within the UK (1838-2016) ”. PLOS ONE 13, no. 10: e0205759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205759.
  14. Cai, Huajian, Xi Zou, Yi Feng, Yunzhi Liu, and Yiming Jing. 2018. “Increasing Need for Uniqueness in Contemporary China: Empirical Evidence”. Frontiers in Psychology 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00554.
  15. Dinur, Rachel, Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, and John E. Hofman. 1996. “First Names as Identity Stereotypes”. The Journal of Social Psychology 136, no. 2: 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9713993.
  16. Edwards, Rosalind, and Chamion Caballero. 2008. “What's in a Name? An Exploration of the Significance of Personal Naming of ‘Mixed’ Children for Parents from Different Racial, Ethnic and Faith Backgrounds”. The Sociological Review 56, no. 1: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00776.x.
  17. Gaddis, S. Michael. 2017a. “How Black are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial Perceptions from Names used in Correspondence Audit Studies”. Sociological Science 4: 469–489.
  18. Gaddis, S. Michael. 2017b. “Racial/Ethnic Perceptions from Hispanic Names: Selecting Names to Test for Discrimination”. Socius 3: 2378023117737193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117737193.
  19. Garðarsdóttir, Ólöf. 1999. “Naming Practices and the Importance of Kinship Networks in Early Nineteenth-Century Iceland”. The History of the Family 4, no. 3: 297–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-602X(99)00017-2.
  20. Gerhards, Jürgen, and Rolf Hackenbroch. 2000. “Trends and Causes of Cultural Modernization:An Empirical Study of First Names”. International Sociology 15, no. 3: 501–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858000015003004.
  21. Goldin, Claudia, and Maria Shim. 2004. “Making a Name: Women's Surnames at Marriage and Beyond”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, no. 2: 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330041371268.
  22. Gooding, Gretchen E., and Rose M. Kreider. 2010. “Women’s Marital Naming Choices in a Nationally Representative Sample”. Journal of Family Issues 31, no. 5: 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x09344688.
  23. Hahn, Matthew W., and R. Alexander Bentley. 2003. “Drift as a Mechanism for Cultural Change: An Example from Baby Names”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270, no. suppl_1: S120–S123. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0045.
  24. Hamamura, Takeshi, and Yi Xu. 2015. “Changes in Chinese Culture as Examined Through Changes in Personal Pronoun Usage”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 46, no. 7: 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115592968.
  25. Harari, Herbert, and John W. McDavid. 1973. "Name Stereotypes and Teachers' Expectations”. Journal of Educational Psychology 65: 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034978.
  26. He, Katherine. 2020. “Long-term Sociolinguistics Trends and Phonological Patterns of American Names”. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4741.
  27. Kopelman, Richard E., Rita J. Shea-Van Fossen, Eletherois Paraskevas, Leanna Lawter, and David J. Prottas. 2009. “The Bride is Keeping her Name: A 35-year Retrospective Analysis of Trends and Correlates”. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 37: 687–700. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.5.687.
  28. Lindsay, Jo, and Deborah Dempsey. 2017. “First Names and Social Distinction: Middle-Class Naming Practices in Australia”. Journal of Sociology 53, no. 3: 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317690925.
  29. Madziva, Roda. 2018. “Your name does not tick the box: the intertwining of names, bodies, religion and nationality in the construction of identity within the UK asylum system”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41, no. 5: 938–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1318215.
  30. Mehrabian, Albert. 1997. “Impressions Created by Given Names”. Names 45, no. 1: 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.1997.45.1.19.
  31. Mehrabian. 2001. “Characteristics Attributed to Individuals on the Basis of their First Names”. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 127, no. 1: 59–88.
  32. Mehrabian, Albert, and Patricia Valdez. 1990. "Basic Name Connotations and Related Sex Stereotyping." Psychological Reports 66 (3_suppl): 1309-1310. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3c.1309.
  33. Mesoudi, Alex, and Stephen J. Lycett. 2009. “Random Copying, Frequency-Dependent Copying and Culture Change”. Evolution and Human Behavior 30, no. 1: 41–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.07.005.
  34. Nuessel, Frank. 2017. “A Note on Popular Baby Names on the Social Security Website: An Important Onomastic Resource”. Names 65, no. 1: 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2016.1197651.
  35. Obasi, Sharon N., Richard Mocarski, Natalie Holt, Debra A. Hope, and Nathan Woodruff. 2019. “Renaming Me: Assessing the Influence of Gender Identity on Name Selection”. Names 67, no. 4: 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2018.1536188.
  36. Ogihara, Yuji. 2021. “Direct Evidence of the Increase in Unique Names in Japan: The Rise of Individualism”. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 2: 100056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100056.
  37. Ogihara, Yuji. 2022. “Common Names Decreased in Japan: Further Evidence of an Increase in Individualism”. Experimental Results 3: e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/exp.2021.27.
  38. Ogihara, Yuji, H. Fujita, H. Tominaga, S. Ishigaki, T. Kashimoto, A. Takahashi, K. Toyohara, and Y. Uchida. 2015. “Are Common Names Becoming Less Common? The Rise in Uniqueness and Individualism in Japan”. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01490.
  39. Pascual, Alexandre, Nicolas Guéguen, Boris Vallée, Marcel Lourel, and Olivier Cosnefroy. 2015. “First Name Popularity as Predictor of Employability”. Names 63, no. 1: 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773814z.00000000091.
  40. Pilcher, J. 2017. “Names and "Doing Gender": How Forenames and Surnames Contribute to Gender Identities, Difference, and Inequalities”. Sex Roles 77, no. 11: 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0805-4.
  41. Pomorski, Mateusz, Małgorzata J. Krawczyk, Krzysztof Kułakowski, Jarosław Kwapień, and Marcel Ausloos. 2016. “Inferring Cultural Regions from Correlation Networks of Given Baby Names”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 445: 169-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.11.003.
  42. Rossi, Alice S. 1965. “Naming Children in Middle-Class Families”. American Sociological Review 30, no. 4: 499-513. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091340.
  43. Sakalli, Erol. 2016. “New Trends in Name-Giving in Turkey”. Voprosy Onomastiki - Problems of Onomastics 13, no. 1: 171-177.
  44. Seeman, M. V. 1972. “Psycho-Cultural Aspects of Naming Children”. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 17, no. 2: 149-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377201700211.
  45. Twenge, Jean M., Emodish M. Abebe, and W. Keith Campbell. 2010. “Fitting In or Standing Out: Trends in American Parents' Choices for Children’s Names, 1880–2007”. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1, no. 1: 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609349515.
  46. Varnum, Michael E. W., and Shinobu Kitayama. 2010. “What’s in a Name?: Popular Names Are Less Common on Frontiers”. Psychological Science 22, no. 2: 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395396.
  47. West, Jevin D., Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M. King, Shelley J. Correll, and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2013. “The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship”. PLOS ONE 8, no. 7: e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.
  48. Youngblood, Mason. 2019. “Conformity Bias in the Cultural Transmission of Music Sampling Traditions”. Royal Society Open Science 6, no. 9: 191149. https://doi.org/doi:10.1098/rsos.191149.
  49. Zelinsky, Wilbur. 1970. “Cultural Variation in Personal Name Patterns in the Eastern United States”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 60, no. 4: 743–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1970.tb00756.x.