Vol. 73 No. 3 (2025): Names: A Journal of Onomastics
Articles

Pet Naming Practices in Turkey: Cats vs. Dogs

PDF
  • F. Nihan Ketrez
F. Nihan Ketrez
Istanbul Bilgi University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2025.2613

Published 2025-09-02

Keywords

  • zoonym,
  • anthroponym,
  • first name,
  • proper name,
  • Turkish,
  • pet-naming practices
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2025 F. Nihan Ketrez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Pet-naming practices reflect the attitudes of pet owners towards their pets and their place in their lives and society. In the US and other western countries, pet animals are often given names that are commonly used for humans. This trend is frequently considered an endorsement of family membership granted to pet animals. In this study, cat and dog names reported by Turkish-speaking cat and dog owners were examined; and the proportion of human vs. non-human, as well as foreign vs. domestic names were investigated. It was observed that cats were more likely to be given human names than dogs. Cats also received more traditional Turkish names, while dogs were more likely to be given foreign or more modern human names. The results are evaluated in relation to the status of pet dogs in the modernization and secularism of modern Turkey. Historically, dogs were granted limited access to homes because of their ritually impure status in Islam. With the modernization and westernization trends, however, having a dog as a pet became a symbol of modernity. The differential pet-naming trends reported in the present study complement such observations regarding the status of cats vs. dogs in modern Turkey.

PDF

References

  1. Abel, Ernest L. 2007. “Birds Are Not More Human than Dogs: Evidence from Naming”. Names 55, no. 4: 349–353.
  2. Abel, Ernest L. and Michael L. Kruger. 2007. “Stereotypic Gender Naming Practices for American and Australian Dogs and Cats”. Names 55, no. 1: 53–64.
  3. Ambaroğlu, Ayşe. 2007. “Türk Toplumunda Evcil Hayvan Besleme Alışkanlıkları ve Din (İstanbul örneği)” [Pet Feeding Habits and Religion in Turkish Society (Istanbul example)]. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  4. Alqarni, Muteb. 2022. “Cat Naming Practices in Saudi Arabia”. Names 70, no. 2: 27–34.
  5. Baysa, Hüseyin. 2021. “Ev ve Süs Hayvanı Edinme Sâiklerinin Fıkhȋ Açıdan Tahlili [The Analysis of the Motivations for the Acquisition of Pet Animals from the Fiqh Perspective]. İslam Hukuki Araştırmaları Dergisi 38: 235–262.
  6. Bergien, Angelika. 2015. “… und gibt ihr eine Art Persönlichkeit. Zur Motivation und Wahrnehmung von Haustiernamen” [“… and gives her a kind of personality. On the Motivation and Perception of Pet Names”]. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 50, no. 1–2: 177–189.
  7. Bergien, Angelika. 2016. “Pet Names as Seismographic Instruments in a Changing Society”. Names and Their Environment: Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Edited by Carole Hough and Daria Izdebska. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. 80–88.
  8. Brandes, Stanley. 2012. “Dear Rin Tin Tin: An Analysis of William Safire’s Dog-Naming Survey From 1985”. Names 60, no. 1: 3–14.
  9. Chen, Lindsey N. H. 2017. “Pet-Naming Practices in Taiwan”. Names 65, no. 3: 167–177.
  10. Çağlar, Hilal. 2019. “Türk kültüründe hayvanlara verilen özel adlar” [Names Given to Animals in Turkish Culture]. International Journal of Humanities and Education 5, no: 11: 391–410.
  11. Çelik, Celaleddin. 2006. “Kültürel Sembol Sistemi Olarak İsimler: İsim Sosyolojisine Giriş” [Names as Cultural Symbol System: Introduction to Name Sociology]. Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi [Çukurova University Journal of the School of Divinity] 6, no .2: 39–61.
  12. Çelik, Celaleddin. 2007. “Bir Kimlik Beyanı Olarak İsimler: Kişi İsimlerine Sosyolojik Bir Yaklaşım” [Names as Declaration of Identity: A Sociological Approach to Person Names]. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 2: 5–21.
  13. Doherty, Ruth. 2020. It’s Official: Brits are Calling their Dogs the Same Names as Their Babies. Countryliving.com.
  14. https://www.countryliving.com/uk/wildlife/pets/a31937754/british-pets-sharing-names-babies/
  15. Emiroğlu, Kudret. 2015. Gündelik Hayatımızın Tarihi [History of our Everyday Life]. İstanbul: Türkiye İş B̧ankası Kültür Yayınları.
  16. Ender, Rita. 2016. İsmiyle Yaşamak [Living with One’s Name]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  17. Etehad, Melissa and Ramin Mostaghim. 2019. “Walking your Dog is Banned in Tehran, but That’s Not Stopping Dedicated Pet Owners”. LA Times. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-iran-dog-walkers-20190130-story.html
  18. Fortuny, Kim. 2014. “Islam, Westernization, and Posthumanist Place: The Case of the Istanbul Street Dog”. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 21, no. 2: 271–297.
  19. Franklin, Adrian. 1999. Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
  20. Güler, Ahmet Faruk. 2020. “Ömer Seyfettin’in ‘Beşeriyet ve Köpek’ Hikâyesinde Medeniyetin Temsili Olarak ‘Köpek’” [Dog’ as a Representation of Civilization in Ömer Seyfettin’s Story “Humanity and Dog”]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 19, no. 3: 713–723.
  21. Gündoğdu, Cihangir. 2018. “The State and the Stray Dogs in Late Ottoman Istanbul: From Unruly Subjects to Servile Friends”. Middle Eastern Studies 54, no. 4: 555–574.
  22. Gündoğdu, Cihangir. 2023. “Dogs Feared and Dogs Loved: Human–Dog Relations in the Late Ottoman Empire”. Society & Animals 31, no. 1: 25–46.
  23. Gürpınar, Doğan. 2021. Türkiye’de Özel İsimlerin Tarihi [The History of Proper Names in Turkey]. İstanbul: Telemak.
  24. Hamedani, Ali. 2022. “The Country Where Having a Pet Could Soon Land You in Jail”. BBC News. Accessed February 13, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62205744
  25. Herzog, Hal. 2011. Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It’s So Hard to Think Straight About Animals. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  26. Herzog, Hal. 2018, September 18. “‘Fido’ or ‘Freddie’? Why Do Some Pet Names Become Popular? Three Tips for Picking a Popular Pet Name”. Psychology Today. Accessed January 4, 2024. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201809/fido-or-freddie-why-do-some-pet-names-become-popular
  27. Kafalı, Hasan. 2022. “Pandemi Döneminde ve Öncesinde Evcil Hayvan Edinme, Hayvanlara Karşı Bazı Tutumlar ve Dindarlık Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma” [A Study of the Relationships Between Having a Pet, Some Attitudes Towards Animals, and Religiosity Tendencies Before and During the Pandemic Period]. Türkiye İlahiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi 6, no. 1: 6–36.
  28. Ketrez, F. Nihan. 2023. “Asymmetry, but Where? Terms of Address in Pet-, Infant- and Child-Directed Speech in Turkish”. Taikomoji Kalbotyra 20: 144–152.
  29. Ketrez, F. Nihan. 2024. “Terms of Address in Turkish Pet-directed Speech: Questionnaire vs. Spontaneous Production Results”. Language and Communication 97: 34–44.
  30. Koçer, Selin. 2024. “Günümüzde İsim Koyma Trendleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme” [A Review on the Modern Naming Trends]. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi 19, no 2: 436–459
  31. Köse, Aynur. 2014. “Değişimin Gölgesindeki Gelenek: Popüler Diziler ve Farklılaşan Ad Verme Kültürü” [Tradition in the Shadow of Change: Popular TV Series]. Millî Folklor 26, no. 101: 291–306.
  32. Leibring, Katharina. 2016. “Names of Companion Animals: Rovers in the Onomasticon?” Names and Their Environment: Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of Onomastic Science, edited by Carole Hough and Daria Izdebska, 114–122. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
  33. Moaveni, Azadeh. 2011, April 19. “The Latest Enemies of Iran: Dogs and their Owners”. TIME. Accessed February 21, 2024. https://content.time.com/tme/world/artcle/0,8599, 2065873,00.html
  34. Nişancı, Zübeyir, Ayşe Betül Aydın and Hatice Nur Keskin, eds. 2023. Faith and Religiosity in Türki-ye. Marmara University. Accessed August, 23, 2023. https://iiit.org/en/book/ faith-and-religiosity-in-turkiye/
  35. Nowak, Jessica. 2015. “ ‘Abutiu‘, ‘Houdini‘ und ‘Chewie‘. Hunderufnamen im Alten Ägypten” [‘Abutiu’, ‘Houdini’ and ‘Chewie’. Dog Call Names in Ancient Egypt]. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 50, no. 1–2: 233–254.
  36. Saarelma-Paukkala, Minna. 2015. “‘Miiru’ and ‘Sissi’, ‘Puppe’ and ‘Rekku’. Practices of Naming Cats and Dogs in Finland. A Case Study Based on Name Day Calendars for Cats and Dogs”. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 50, no. 1–2: 219–231.
  37. Schaab, Eva. 2012. “Von ‘Bello’ zu ‘Paul’: Zum Wandel und zur Struktur von Hunderufnamen. Beiträge zur Namenforschung” [From ‘Bello’ to ‘Paul’: On the Change and Structure of Dog Call Names. Contributions to Name Research]. Jahrgang 47, no. 2: 131–161.
  38. Shick, İrvin Cemil. 2019. “Müslüman Türkler ve Köpekler” [Muslim Turks and Dogs]. Toplumsal Tarih 310: 24–32.
  39. Safire, William. 1985, December 22. “Name that Dog”. New York Times Magazine.
  40. Subaşı, Věra. 2011. “Dogs in Islam”. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Vienna, Austria.
  41. Thomas, Keith.1983. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Allen Lane.
  42. Türköz, Meltem. 2023. Bu Soyadı Alınmamış ise: Ulus İnşası ve Soyadları [If This Surname Was Not Taken: Construction of Nation and Surnames]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  43. Walker-Meikle, Kathleen. 2012. Medieval Pets. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell & Brewer.
  44. Yagafarova, Gülnaz. 2021. “Başkurtların Dil Bilincinde İsim ve Ad Verme” [Name and Naming Consciousness of the Bashkirs]. I. Uluslararası Adbilim Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı [Proceedings of the First Onomastic Symposium], edited by Zeki Kaymaz and İbrahim Şahin. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları. 237–243.
  45. Yakub, Mohammed. 2020. “A Linguistic Analysis of ‘Pet Names’ in Nzema: A Morphosyntactic Description”. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics 1, no. 1: 1–18.