Vol. 74 No. 2 (2026): NAMES: A Journal of Onomastics
Articles

Naming New Commune-Level Units: Retention, Combination, and Innovation in Việt Nam’s 2025 Administrative Reform

Khoa Nguyen-Viet
Ha Noi University of Science & Technology

Published 2026-05-26

Keywords

  • toponymy,
  • name retention,
  • name innovation,
  • place branding,
  • Việt Nam,
  • administrative reform,
  • Vietnam
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Việt Nam’s 2025 commune-level administrative consolidation, enacted through Resolution 202/2025/QH15 by the National Assembly, provides a large-scale context for examining how states negotiate identity through place naming. This study analyzes 3,321 newly constituted commune-level units to identify patterns of name retention, combination, and innovation. Using a mixed-methods design that integrates quantitative pattern mapping with qualitative analysis of policy documents, historical maps, and toponymic archives, it interprets naming as a sociolinguistic process through which governance, heritage, and collective identity intersect. The findings reveal a predominance of name retention in rural, culturally cohesive areas, and greater innovation in urban centers such as Hồ Chí Minh City, where renaming reinforced heritage and place branding. Situating the Vietnamese case within the framework of critical toponymy, the study demonstrates how large-scale administrative reforms mediate between political rationalization and symbolic continuity. It contributes to onomastic scholarship by proposing a replicable model for analyzing state-led renaming and by advancing understanding of how naming practices encode power, memory, and belonging.

References

  1. Alderman, Derek H, and Joshua Inwood. 2013. “Street Naming and the Politics of Belonging: Spatial Injustices in the Toponymic Commemoration of Martin Luther King Jr”. Social & Cultural Geography 14, no. 2: 211–233.
  2. Azaryahu, Maoz. 2011. “The Critical Turn and Beyond: The Case of Commemorative Street Naming”. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 10, no. 1: 28–44.
  3. Bigon, Liora. 2020. “Towards Creating a Global Urban Toponymy - a Comment”. Urban Science 4, no. 4: 1-9.
  4. Blair, David, and Jan Tent. 2021. “A Revised Typology of Place-Naming”. Names 69, no. 4: 30–47.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Božilović, Jelena. 2025. “Street Names as a Locus of Patriarchy: A Case Study of the City of Niš”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 25, no. 3: 465-483.
  7. Bùi, Đình Phong, and Văn Cường Lê. 2025. “Đặt tên xã, phường có tầm nhìn trăm năm, cần nghiên cứu kỹ lưỡng, thấu đáo”. [Naming Communes and Wards Should Be Undertaken with a Hundred-Year Vision and Require Careful, Thorough Study]. Interview by Kim Anh. VOV - Voice of Vietnam, April 20, 2025. Accessed August 10, 2025. https://vov.vn/chinh-tri/dat-ten-xa-phuong-co-tam-nhin-tram-nam-can-nghien-cuu-ky-luong-thau-dao-post1194314.vov
  8. Bùi, Hoài Sơn. 2025. “Đặt tên xã, phường ở Hà Nội: Có chiều sâu, coi trọng ký ức tập thể”. [Naming Communes and Wards in Hanoi: Depth and Respect for Collective Memory]. Interview by N. Huyền. VietNamNet, May 6, 2025. Accessed August 10, 2025. https://vietnamnet.vn/dat-ten-xa-phuong-o-ha-noi-co-chieu-sau-coi-trong-ky-uc-tap-the-2397818.html
  9. Creswell, John W, and Vicki Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
  10. Filipa, Raimundo, and Paris André. 2025. “After the Carnation Revolution. Continuity and Innovations in Portuguese Odonomastics: The Case of Aveiro”. Memoria E Ricerca no. 1: 83-102.
  11. Gnatiuk, Oleksiy. 2025. “‘Iron Ukrainization.’” Names: Journal of Onomastics 73, no. 2: 46–57.
  12. Government News. 2019. “VN to Reduce Number of Districts, Communes”. En.baochinhphu.vn. Vietnamese Government. March 13, 2019. Accessed August 10, 2025. https://en.baochinhphu.vn/vn-to-reduce-number-of-districts-communes-11134675.htm
  13. Government News. 2025. “34 Nghị quyết của UBTVQH về sắp xếp các đơn vị hành chính cấp xã”. [34 Resolutions of the Standing Committee of the National Assembly on the Arrangement of Commune-Level Administrative Units]. Baochinhphu.vn. Vietnamese Government. June 18, 2025. Accessed August 10, 2025. https://baochinhphu.vn/34-nghi-quyet-cua-ubtvqh-ve-sap-xep-cac-don-vi-hanh-chinh-cap-xa-102250618163209716.htm
  14. Gritta, Milan, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, and Nigel Collier. 2020. “A Pragmatic Guide to Geoparsing Evaluation”. Language Resources and Evaluation 54, no. 3: 683–712.
  15. Lê, Trung Hoa. 2006. Địa danh học Việt Nam. [Vietnamese Toponymy]. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  16. Lê, Trung Hoa. 2012. Tìm hiểu địa danh Việt Nam. [Exploring Vietnamese Place Names]. Ho Chi Minh City: Social Sciences Publishing House.
  17. Light, Duncan, Ion Nicolae, and Bogdan Suditu. 2002. “Toponymy and the Communist City: Street Names in Bucharest, 1948–1965”. GeoJournal 56, no. 2: 135–144.
  18. National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 2025a. Law 65/2025/QH15 (Law on Organization of Local Governments No. 65/2025/QH15). Adopted March 1, 2025.
  19. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=213074&classid=1
  20. National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 2025b. Resolution 202/2025/QH15 on the Reorganization of Provincial-Level Administrative Divisions. Adopted June 12, 2025. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=213930
  21. National Assembly Standing Committee of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 2025. Resolution 76/2025/UBTVQH15 on the Arrangement of Commune-Level Administrative Units in 2025. Adopted April 15, 2025. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=213382
  22. Ndletyana, Mcebisi. 2012. “Changing Place Names in Postapartheid South Africa: Accounting for the Unevenness”. Social Dynamics 38, no. 1: 87–103.
  23. Nenotek, Seprianus A. 2025. “When Names Speak: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Street Toponymy in Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara-Indonesia”. Journal of Language, Education, Literature and Culture 3, no. 1: 53–62.
  24. Nguyễn, Công Đức, and Văn Lập Nguyễn. 2015. “Địa danh học Việt Nam: Những vấn đề cần bàn” [Vietnamese Toponymy: Issues for Discussion]. Language and Life 234, no. 4: 1–5.
  25. Nguyễn, Kiên Trường. 1996. “Đặc điểm chính về địa danh Hải Phòng (trong Vài nét đối sánh với địa danh Việt Nam)”. [Main Features of Hai Phong Place Names (in Comparison with Vietnamese Place Names)]. Doctoral dissertation, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
  26. Nguyễn, Quang Ân. 2024. Thành lập và thay đổi địa danh, địa giới đơn vị hành chính trong lịch sử Việt Nam. [Establishment and Change of Place Names and Administrative Boundaries in the History of Vietnam]. Hanoi: NXB Chính trị quốc gia sự thật.
  27. Nguyễn, Văn Âu. 2000. Một số vấn đề về địa danh Việt Nam. [Some Matters Regarding Vietnamese Toponyms]. Hanoi: VNU Hanoi National University Press.
  28. Quang Tuệ, Thuỳ Linh, and Duy Khánh. 2025. “Tên phường xã mới được đặt lại thế nào” [How New Commune and Ward Names are Chosen]. VnExpress. Bộ Khoa học và Công nghệ [Ministry of Science and Technology]. Accessed August 10, 2025.
  29. https://vnexpress.net/ten-phuong-xa-moi-duoc-dat-lai-the-nao-4918502.html
  30. Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Derek Alderman, and Maoz Azaryahu. 2008. “Collective Memory and the Politics of Urban Space: An Introduction”. GeoJournal 73, no. 3: 161–164.
  31. Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Derek Alderman, and Maoz Azaryahu. 2009. “Geographies of Toponymic Inscription: New Directions in Critical Place-Name Studies”. Progress in Human Geography 34, no. 4: 453–470.
  32. Różycki, Bartłomiej. 2018. “Renaming Urban Toponomy as a Mean of Redefining Local Identity: The Case of Street Decommunization in Poland”. Open Political Science 1, no. 1: 20–31.
  33. Spolsky, Bernard. 2003. Language Policy. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Trần, Trí Dõi. 2008. “Tên gọi của sông Hồng: Dấu tích biểu hiện nét đa dạng văn hóa trong lịch sử người Việt”. [Names of the Red River: Traces Reflecting Cultural Diversity in Vietnamese History]. In Third International Conference on Vietnamese Studies, 62–76. Hanoi: NXB Thông tin và Truyền thông.
  35. Từ, Thu Mai. 2004. “Place Names in Quang Tri”. Hanoi: University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
  36. Tubić, Tamara. 2024. “О промени сјеничких ходонима са ономастичког и социолингвистичког аспекта. [On the Change of Sjenica’s Hodonyms from an Onomastic and Sociolinguistic Aspect]”. Гласник Етнографског института САНУ [Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA] LXXII/2024, no. 3: 201–218.
  37. Ursini, Francesco-Alessio, and Haiping Long. 2024. “Urbanonyms and Their Linguistic Properties in Italian”. Names 72, no. 3: 65–75.
  38. Usmonova, Mohinur, and Mushtariy Xujboyeva. 2025. “Symbolism and Identity in Toponyms: Cultural and Ideological Layers in Place Naming”. Развитие и инновации в науке [Development and Innovation in Science] 4, no. 6: 84–87. Accessed August 10, 2025.
  39. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/dis/article/view/113724
  40. Vũ, Thị Sao Chi, and Đức Tồn Nguyễn. 2023. “Nghiên cứu địa danh từ phương diện văn hóa dân tộc và trường hợp lai lịch địa danh ‘Kinh Môn’ (Hải Dương)”. [A Study of Place Names from the Perspective of Ethnic Culture and the Case of the Renaming of Kinh Mon Place Names (Hai Duong)]. Vietnam Social Sciences no. 12: 122–31.
  41. Wanjiru, Melissa Wangui, and Kosuke Matsubara. 2017. “Street Toponymy and the Decolonisation of the Urban Landscape in Postcolonial Nairobi”. Journal of Cultural Geography 34, no. 1: 1–23.
  42. Ye, Peng, Yujin Jiang, and Yadi Wang. 2025. “CHTopo: A Multi-Source Large-Scale Chinese Toponym Annotation Corpus”. Information 16, no. 7: 1-18.
  43. Yeoh, Brenda. 1996. “Street Naming and Nation Building: Toponymic Inscriptions of Nationhood in Singapore”. Area 28, no 3: 298–307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003708