Vol. 55 No. 1 (2007)
Research Article

Stereotypic Gender Naming Practices For American And Australian Dogs And Cats

PDF
  • Ernest L. Abel,
  • Michael L. Kruger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2007.55.1.53

Published 2007-03-01

Copyright (c) 2007 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

Pets are considered as part of the family in many households. As such, the names people give their pets ought to resemble the names they give their children in terms of sex-stereotypic phonological characteristics. A previous study indicated that this was true for Golden Retriever dogs. The present study determined 1) if such sex stereotyping was true for dogs in general, 2) also extended to cats, and 3) if the same phenomena held for both the United States and Australia. We compared the final written letter and final spoken phoneme in pet and human names, as well as the ‘first and last consonants, and syllable lengths in their names. We found that people applied the same gender-related naming practices for pets that they used for both male and female children. The only difference we found between U.S. and Australian naming for pets was that Americans gave their pets names that were more characteristic of male names than female names. We concluded that Americans and Australians used the same masculine/feminine rules for naming their pets as they do for naming their children.

PDF

References

  1. Abel, Ernest L. and Kruger, Michael L. 2007. “Gender related naming practices. Similarities and differences between people and their dogs.” In submission.
  2. About.com. Real Men Do Love Cats.
  3. http://cats.about.com/cs/menandtheircats/a/realmenlovecats_2.htm). 3/23/2006.
  4. AVMA. 2003. U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographics Sourcebook Schaumburg, II.: American Veterinary Medical Association.
  5. APPMA. National Pet Owners Survey. 2005. Greenwich, CT: American Pet Products Manufacturers Association.
  6. AAHA. 2006. “Our relationship with pets.” American Animal Hospital Assocation.
  7. www.swaebr.org/Our_Relationship_withPets.html.
  8. Barry, Herbert III and Harper, Aylene S. 1995. “Increased choice of female phonetic attributes in first names.” Sex Roles 32: 809–819.
  9. Barry, Herbert III and Harper, Aylene S. 2000. “Three last letters identify most female first names.” Psychological Reports 87: 48–54.
  10. Barry, Herbert III and Harper, Aylene S. .2003. “Final letter compared with final phoneme in male and female names.” Names 51:13–22.
  11. Beck, A. M. and Katcher, A. H. 1996. Between Pets and People: The importance of Animal Companionship. Indiana: Purdue Press 47–49.
  12. Cassidy, Kimberly, Kelly, M. and Sharoni, I. 1999. “Inferring gender from name phonology.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 128: 362–381.
  13. Horn, J. C. and Meer, J. 1984. “The Pleasure of their company: PT survey report on pets. “Psychology Today 18 (8): 52–59.
  14. Hough, Carole. 2000. “Towards an explanation of phonetic differentiation in masculine and feminine personal names.” Journal of Linguistics 36:1–11.
  15. Lieberson, Stanley and Bell, Eleanor O. 1992. “Children’s first names: an empirical study of social taste.” American Journal of Sociology 98:511–554.
  16. McHarg, Baidock, C., Headey, B. and Robinson, B. 1995. A. National People and Pets Survey, http: //www.petnet.com.au/People_and_Pets/52UAMR.HTML..
  17. Meer, J. 1984. “Pet Theories: Facts and Figures to Chew on.” Psychology Today 18 (8): 60–68.
  18. New York Times. 1981. Undertaker for Pets. 3 March, p. 41.
  19. Slater, A. S. and Feinman, S. .1985. “Gender and the phonology of North American first names.” Sex Roles 13: 429–440.
  20. Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. .1990. Measuring Sex Stereotypes. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
  21. Wright, Saundra K., Hay, Jeniffer and Bent, Tessa 2005. “Ladies first? Gender phonology, and the naming conspiracy.” Linguistics 43:531–561.