Vol. 59 No. 1 (2011)
Research Article

Socioeconomic Determinants of First Names

PDF
  • Gerrit Bloothooft,
  • David Onland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311X12942225544679

Published 2011-03-01

Keywords

  • BIRTH NAMES,
  • WOMEN,
  • MARRIAGE,
  • RELIGION,
  • AGE

Copyright (c) 2011 Maney Publishing

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

Modern naming practices in the Netherlands between 1982 and 2005 were studied on the basis of 1409 popular first names, divided into fourteen name groups determined by the common preferences of parents for the names involved. Socioeconomic variables such as family income, parents' level of education, and lifestyle indicators were analyzed in relation to the names — and name groups — of the children in 281,751 households. Naming practices could be described on two independent dimensions. The first of these was education and family income: parents with lower incomes and levels of education preferred English, Italian, Spanish, and international names, while those with higher incomes and levels of education chose predominantly Dutch, Frisian, Nordic, Hebrew, and French names. A second dimension distinguished between conservative and religious parents with a preference for traditional names, and trendy parents who favored shorter and modern names. The complex nature of the relationship between social class and naming practice, and its dynamics, is discussed.

PDF

References

  1. Andersen, Christian. 1977. Studien zur Namengebung in Nordfriesland. Die Bökingharde 1760–1970. Clausthal Zellerfeld: Böneke.
  2. Besnard, Philippe & Cyril Grange. 1993. “La fin de la diffusion vertigale des gouts? (Prénoms de l’elite et du vulgum).” L’Année sociologique 43: 269–94.
  3. Bloothooft, Gerrit, Emma van Nifterick, & Doreen Gerritzen. 2004. On First Names — How The Netherlands Gets its First Names. Utrecht: Het Spectrum (in Dutch).
  4. Bloothooft, Gerrit & Loek Groot. 2008. “Name Clustering on the Basis of Parental Preferences.” Names 56: 111–63.
  5. Debus, Friedhelm, Joachim Hartig, Hubertus Menke, & Günter Schmitz. 1973. “Namengebung und soziale Schicht. Bericht über ein Projekt zur Personennamenkunde.” Naamkunde 5: 368–405.
  6. Desplanques, Guy. 1986. “Les enfants de Michel et Martine Dupont s’appellent Nicolas et Céline.” Economie et statistique 184(1): 63–83.
  7. Dupâquier, Jacques, Jean-Pierre Pélissier, & Danièle Rébaudo. 1986. Le temps des Jules: les prénoms en France au XÎXe siècle. Paris: Ed. Christian.
  8. Fryer, Roland G. & Steven D. Levitt. 2004. “The Causes and Consequences of Distinctly Black Names.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3): 767–805.
  9. Gerhards, Jürgen. 2003. Die Moderne und ihre Vornamen, eine Einladung in die Kultursoziologie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  10. Gorsuch, Richard L. 1983. Factor Analysis. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  11. Leys, Odo. 1974. “Sociolinguistic Aspects of Namegiving Patterns.” Onoma 18: 448–55.
  12. Lieberson, Stanley & Eleanor O. Bell. 1992. “Children’s First Names: an Empricial Study of Social Taste.” The American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 511–554.
  13. Lieberson, Stanley. 2000. A Matter of Taste — How Names, Fashions and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  14. Mateos, Pablo, Richard Webber, & Paul Longley. 2007. “The Cultural, Ethnic, and Linguistic Classification of Populations and Neighbourhoods Using Personal Names.” CASA Working Paper 116. Available at: <http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper116.pdf>
  15. National Bureau of Statistics, The Netherlands. 2007. Available at:
  16. Seibicke, Wilfried. 1996. “Traditionen der Vornamengebung. Motivationen, Vorbilder, Moden: Germanisch.” Name Studies: An Înternational Handbook of Onomastics, Namenforschung in Handbook of Onomastics. Ed. E. Eichler, G. Hilty, H. Loffler, H. Steger, L. Zgusta, and W. Bright. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter,1207–14.
  17. Vandebosch, Heidi. 1998. “The Influence of Media on Given Names.” Names 46: 243–62.