Vol. 61 No. 1 (2013)
Research Article

A Question of Faith: An Investigation of Suggested Racial Ethnonyms for Enumerating US American Residents of Muslim, Middle Eastern, and/or Arab Descent on the US Census

Published 2013-03-01

Keywords

  • blends,
  • orthography,
  • morphology,
  • word-recognition,
  • phonology,
  • compounds,
  • fan culture
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Abstract

In 1790, the American government ratified the first official census of the nation’s population. Since then, the US Census has been taken continuously every ten years and has become indispensable for the equitable distribution of rights and resources. Nevertheless, the Census has not escaped criticism. In particular, its system of ethnoracial nomenclature is regularly attacked for failing to adequately reflect the nation’s changing demography and linguistic sensibilities. Consequently, many critics have called for the introduction of new terminology. The present investigation examines some of the most popular names suggested for one group in particular: US American Residents of Muslim, Middle Eastern and/or Arab descent (AROMMEA). The four racial ethnonyms examined are Arab-American; Middle Easterner/Middle-East American; Muslim-American; and White.1 As this investigation demonstrates, each of these names comes with its own unique set of linguistic, social, and political advantages and disadvantages.

References

  1. Aspinall Peter. 2008. The Categorization of African Descent Populations in Europe and the USA. Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health 122(1): 61–69.
  2. Aspinall Peter. 2009. Collective Terminology to Describe the Minority Ethnic Population. Sociology 36(4): 803–816.
  3. Brittingham Angela, Cruz Patricia de la. 2005. We the People of Arab Ancestry in the United States. Census 2000 Special Reports. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  4. Cainkar Louise. 2008. Thinking Outside the Box: Arabs and Race in the United States. Race and Arab Americans Before and After 9/11. Ed. Jamal Amaney and Nadine Naber. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, pp. 46–88.
  5. Chon Margaret, Arzt Donna. 2005. Walking While Muslim. Law and Contemporary Problems 68(2): 215–254.
  6. Davison, Roderic.1960. Where is the Middle East? Foreign Affairs 38(4): 665–675.
  7. El-Badry Samia, Swanson David. 2007. Providing Census Tabulations to Government Security Agencies in the United States: The Case of Arab Americans. Government Information Quarterly 24(2): 470–487.
  8. Register Federal. 1995. Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity: August 28th. Office of Management and Budget. Available at: (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  9. Register Federal. 1997. Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity: October 30th. Office of Management and Budget. Available at: (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  10. Register Federal. 2011. Department of Commerce Announcement of Public Meeting: March 3rd. Office of Management and Budget. Available at: <https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/03/30/2011-7450/census-advisory-committees> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  11. Hassan Salah. 2002 Arabs, Race, and the Post-September 11 National Security State. Middle East Report 224. Available at: <http://www.merip.org/mer/,er224/224_hassan.html> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  12. Hixson Lindsay, Hepler Bradford, Kim Myoung Ouk. 2011. The White Population: 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office.
  13. Humes Karen, Jones Nicholas, Ramirez Roberto. 2011. Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
  14. Lyovin Anatole. 1997. An Introduction to the Languages of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. National Center for Education Statistics. Statistical Standards: Defining Race and Ethnicity Data. Available at: <http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/2002/std1_5.asp#> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  16. PEW Research Center. 2011. Muslim Americans: No Signs of Growth in Alienation or Support for Extremism. Available at: <http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2087/muslim-americans-islamic-extremism-911-attacks-mosuqes> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  17. Protect America Act. 2007. Available at: <http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/docs/text-of-paa.pdf> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  18. Ramirez Roberto. 2004. We the People: Hispanics in the United States. Census 2000 Special Reports. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  19. Review of Federal Measurements of Race and Ethnicity Hearings. 1994. Serial No. 103–7. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  20. Rosen Anne. 2010. A Brief History of Religion and the US Census. The PEW Forum on Religion and Public Life. Available at: <http://www.pewforum.org/Government/A-Brief-History-of-Religion-and-the-U-S-Census.aspx>
  21. Seltzer William, Anderson Margo. 2001. The Dark Side of Numbers: The Role of Population Data Systems in Human Rights Abuses. Social Research 68(2): 481–513.
  22. Shora Kareem. 2009. NSEERS: The Consequences of America’s Efforts to Secure its Borders. Pennsylvania: Penn State University’s Dickinson School of Law Center for Immigrants’ Rights.
  23. Southern Poverty Law Center. 2012. FBI: Dramatic Spike in Hate Crimes Targeting Muslims. Intelligence Report No.145. Available at: <http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report>
  24. Tehranian John. 2008. Selective Racialization: Middle Eastern American Identity and the Faustian Pact with Whiteness. Connecticut Law Review 40(4): 1201–1235.
  25. US Census Bureau. 1977. Directive No. 15. Available at: <http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/populations/bridged-race/Directive15.html> (Accessed May 19, 2012)
  26. Von Bruck Gabriele, Bodenhorn Barbara. 2006. Entangled in Histories. The Anthropology of Names and Naming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Wallman Katherine, Evinger Suzann, Schechter Susan. 2000. Measuring our Nation’s Diversity. American Journal of Public Health, 90(11): 1704–1708.