Vol. 61 No. 2 (2013)
Research Article

What Makes the Names of Middle-earth So Fitting? Elements of Style in the Namecraft of J. R. R. Tolkien

PDF
  • Christopher L Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773812Z.00000000040

Published 2013-06-01

Copyright (c) 2013 American Name Society 2013

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

What makes a name ‘fitting’? Or, in closely related formulations, what makes a name ‘sound right’ or ‘ring true’? From the Cratylus to present-day studies in literary onomastics, the usual answer is that a name is fitting, right, or true for the person, place, or thing that bears it. The names in J. R. R. Tolkien’s fiction are fitting in this sense, reflecting by way of their source words, sound symbolism, or etymology some characteristic of their designees. At the same time, however, Tolkien insists that a name fit not only its designee, but also the phonological and morphological style of the nomenclature to which it belongs, as well as the linguistic scheme of his invented world. These elements of style are determined at the level of the nomenclature as a whole, independently from concerns with the motivation of individual names. The personal and place names of Middle-earth are thus fitting in more than the usual sense.

PDF

References

  1. Algeo John. 1985. ‘The Toponymy of Middle-earth.’ Names 33: 80–95.
  2. Finke Wayne H. 1995. Book Review. Names 43: 66–68.
  3. Genette Gérard. 1994. Mimologics. Trans. Thaïs E. Morgan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  4. Grimaud Michel. 1989. ‘Onomastics and the Study of Literature.’ Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 38:16–35.
  5. Gymnich Marion. 2005. ‘Reconsidering the Linguistics of Middle-earth.’ Reconsidering Tolkien. Ed. Thomas Honegger. Zollikofen: Walking Tree Publishers, 7–30.
  6. Jeffrey David Lyle. 2004. ‘Tolkien as Philologist.’ Tolkien and the Invention of Myth. Ed. Jance Chance. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 61–78.
  7. Noel Ruth S. 1974. The Languages of Tolkien’s Middle-earth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  8. Robinson Christopher L. 2010a. ‘Childhood Readings and the Genesis of Names in the Earthsea Novels of Ursula K. Le Guin.’ Children’s Literature 38: 92–114.
  9. ——. 2010b. ‘Teratonymy: The Weird and Monstrous Names of H.P. Lovecraft.’ Names 58: 127–138.
  10. Shippey TA. 1979. ‘Creation from Philology in The Lord of the Rings.’ J. R. R. Tolkien, Scholar and Storyteller. Ed. Mary Salk and Robert T. Farrell. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 286–316.
  11. Smith Ross. 2006. ‘Fitting Sense to Sound: Linguistic Aesthetics and Phonosemantics in the Work of J. R. R. Tolkien.’ Tolkien Studies 3: 1–20.
  12. Tolkien JRR. 1975. ‘Guide to the Names in The Lord of the Rings.’ A Tolkien Compass. Ed. Jared Lobdell. La Salle: Open Court, 153–201.
  13. ——. 2002. The Lost Road and Other Writings. Ed. Christopher Tolkien. London: Harper Collins.
  14. ——. 2004. The Lord of the Rings. 50th Anniversary Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  15. ——. 2006a. The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien. Ed. Humphrey Carter. London: Harper Collins.
  16. ——. 2006b. The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays. Ed. Christopher Tolkien. London: Harper Collins.
  17. Valesio Paolo. 1973. ‘Levels of Phonological Admissibility.’ Linguistics 106: 28–53.