Vol. 65 No. 2 (2017)
Article

“Mr de Bussy” is More Employable than “Mr Bussy”: The Impact of a Particle Associated with the Surname of an Applicant in a Job Application Evaluation Context

Published 2017-04-03

Keywords

  • namesake,
  • given name,
  • celebrity,
  • Israel,
  • Hebrew,
  • identity
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Previous studies examining the effect of surnames on evaluations have shown that surnames are associated with connotations which influence how we evaluate people. In this experiment, conducted in France, we examined the effect of the nobiliary particle “de” associated with a surname in a job application evaluation situation. A male applicant’s résumé was presented to participants, randomly divided into two independent groups, who were asked to evaluate him in relation to a job offer. The offer was for an assistant in human resources in a mid-size company, and the résumé was from a 23-year-old male applicant with a university education in human resources. Depending upon the experimental condition, the applicant’s full name was “Julien Bussy” or “Julien de Bussy,” but the résumé was identical in both conditions. Results indicated that the applicant whose surname included a particle was perceived to be more serious, competent, confident, and clever than the applicant without the particle. In the end, the participants in the particle condition believed that the applicant would have more chances of being selected for the job than the applicant without the particle. This effect was particularly noted with female participants. These results thus support the notion that the nobiliary particle attached to an individual’s surname has implications for people’s evaluation of that person.

References

  1. Allport, G. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
  2. Barthelemy, T. 2000. “Patronymic names and Noms de terre In the french nobility in the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries.” The History of the Family 5: 181–197.10.1016/S1081-602X(00)00041-5
  3. Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination.” The American Economic Review 94: 991–1013.10.1257/0002828042002561
  4. Colman, A.M., W. Sluckin, and D.J. Hargreaves. 1981. “The effects of familiarity on preferences for surnames.” British Journal of Psychology 72: 363–369.10.1111/bjop.1981.72.issue-3
  5. Driggers, K.J., and T. Helms. 2000. “The effects of salary on willingness to date.” Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research 5: 76–80.
  6. Dunn, M.J., and R. Searle. 2010. “Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings.” British Journal of Psychology 101: 69–80.10.1348/000712609X417319
  7. Guéguen, N., and L. Lamy. 2012. “Men’s status and attractiveness for women: A field dating experiment.” Swiss Journal of Psychology 71: 157–160.10.1024/1421-0185/a000083
  8. Hargreaves, D.J., A.M., Colman, and W. Sluckin. 1983. “The attractiveness of names.” Human Relations 36: 393–401.10.1177/001872678303600404
  9. Laham, S., P. Koval, and A.L. Alter. 2012. “The name pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith More than Mr. Colquhoun.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 16–21.
  10. Luscri, G., and P.B. Mohr. 1998. “Surname effects in judgments of mock jurors.” Psychological Report 82: 1023–1026.10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3.1023
  11. Mair, G. 1986. “Ethnic minorities, probation, and the magistrates’ courts: A pilot study.” British Journal of Criminology 26: 147–155.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047591
  12. O’Sullivan, C.S., A. Chen, S. Mohapatra, L. Sigelman, and A. Lewis. 1988. “Voting in ignorance: The politics of smooth-sounding names.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18: 1094–1106.10.1111/jasp.1988.18.issue-13
  13. Radelet, M.L., and G.L. Pierce. 1985. “Race and prosecutorial discretion in homicide cases.” Law & Society Review 19: 587–622.10.2307/3053422
  14. Shuler, G.A., and D.M. McCord. 2010. “Determinants of male attractiveness: “Hotness” ratings as a function of perceived resources.” American Journal of psychological Research 6: 10–23.
  15. Smith, G.W. 1998. “The political impact of name sounds.” Communication Monographs 65: 154–172.10.1080/03637759809376443