Vol. 65 No. 3 (2017)
Article

The Role of Phonesthemes in Shoegaze Naming Conventions

PDF
  • Zac Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2017.1304105

Published 2017-07-03

Keywords

  • anthroponyms,
  • ancient Peru,
  • Peruvian North Coast,
  • Mochica language,
  • mythology,
  • etymology,
  • Ñaimlap
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2017 American Name Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article focuses on some observed similarities between band names, album titles, and song titles within the shoegazing subgenre of rock music, which is characterized by loud, swirling layers of distorted guitar and droning noise. The onomastic similarities are analyzed in terms of phonesthemes, which are submorphemic sound/meaning pairs, wherein a particular phone or cluster of phones is taken to denote some abstract semantic space. As experiments show that native speaker awareness of phonesthemes influences neologistic production and perception, I argue that the preponderance of band names like Swirl and Swoon within shoegaze is due to an overlap between the genre’s aesthetic characteristics and the semantic space described by a specific set of phonesthemes in English.

PDF

References

  1. Abelin, Å. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
  2. Abramova, E., and R. Fernández. 2016. Questioning arbitrariness in language: A data-driven study of conventional iconicity. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, San Diego.
  3. Abramova, E., R. Fernández, and F. Sangati. 2013. Automatic labeling of phonesthemic senses. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Cognitive Science Meeting 2013, Berlin.
  4. Androutsopoulos, J.K. 2000. What names reveal about the music style: A study of naming patterns in popular music. In Pragmatics in 2000: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Volume 2. pp. 16–29.
  5. Aronoff, M. 1981. Automobile semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 12, no. 3: 329–347.
  6. BandCamp.com 2016. All tags – Bandcamp. https://www.bandcamp.com/tags (accessed October 23, 2016).
  7. Bergen, B. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2): 290–311.10.1353/lan.2004.0056
  8. Burnard, L. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford Universtity Computing Services.
  9. Cohen, I. 2015. Tracks. http://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/17359-westkust-swirl/ (accessed october 8, 2016.
  10. Firth, J.R. (1930) 1964. The tongues of men, and speech. London: Oxford University Press.
  11. Fisher, D.R. 2006. My bloody valentine’s loveless. Master’s thesis, USA, Florida State University
  12. Fu, K.-C. 2015. Would you like to come and meet me maybe?” The significance of words in britpop music in a transcultural context. Master’s thesis, Goldsmiths College, University of London.
  13. Harbeck, J.C. 2016. Relative use of phonaesthemes in the constitution and development of genres. Ph. D. thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Linguistics, York University, Toronto.
  14. Howells, T. 2015. Blackgaze: Meet the bands taking black metal out of the shadows. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/oct/05/blackgaze-bands-fusing-metal-and-shoegaze (accessed October 23, 2016).
  15. Hutchins, S.S. 1998. The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonesthemes. Ph. D. thesis, Emory University.
  16. Klosterman, C. 2004. Give me centrism or give me death! http://www.spin.com/2004/12/give-me-centrism-or-give-me-death/ (accessed October 23, 2016).
  17. Landauer, T.K., P.W. Foltz, and D. Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, no. 2-3: 259–284.10.1080/01638539809545028
  18. Larkin, C. 1995. The guinness who’s who of indie and new wave music. Middlesex: Guinness.
  19. Lehrer, A. 1992. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Erlbaum. 123–142.
  20. Lena, J.C. 2012. Banding together: How communities create genres in popular music. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rrzb
  21. Long, P. 2014. The sound of in-between: Exploring liminality in popular music composition. B.A. Thesis, School of Humanities and Communication Arts, University of Western Sydney.
  22. Luu, C. 2016. The Linguistics of my next band name. http://daily.jstor.org/the-linguistics-of-my-next-band-name/ (accessed October 26, 2016).
  23. Magnus, M. 2000. What’s in a word? Evidence for phonosemantics. Ph. D. thesis, Trondheim, Norway, University of Trondheim.
  24. McGonigal, M. 2007. My bloody valentine’s loveless. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  25. McKinstry, L. 2015. Everything you need to know about the impending shoegaze revival. http://www.altpress.com/features/entry/everything_you_need_to_know_about_the_impending_shoegaze_revival (accessed January 30, 2015).
  26. Otis, K., and E. Sagi 2008. Phonaesthemes: A corpus-based analysis. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, D.C. pp. 65–70.
  27. Plent, J. 2016. Listen: Swerve ‘Swerve EP’. https://bittersweetsymphonies.co.uk/2016/03/03/listen-swerve-self-titled-ep/ (accessed October 26, 2016).
  28. Sangild, T. 2002. The aesthetics of noise. Denmark: Datanom Copenhagen.
  29. Shrum, L., T.M. Lowrey, D. Luna, D. Lerman, and M. Liu. 2012. Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing 29, no. 3: 275–279.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.03.002
  30. Staff, C. 2012. Dreamlab: The semantics of post-rock. http://consequenceofsound.net/aux-out/dreamlab-the-semantics-of-post-rock/ (accessed October 23, 2016).
  31. Stannard, J. 2008. Metal gaze – From my bloody valentine to Nadja via SunnO))). http://thequietus.com/articles/00376-in-extremis-metal-gaze (accessed October 23, 2016).
  32. Yorkston, E., and G. Menon. 2004. A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 1: 43–51.10.1086/383422
  33. Zhang, S., B H. Schmitt, and H. Haley. 2003. Language and culture: Linguistic effects on consumer behavior in international marketing research. Handbook of research in international marketing. 228–243.