Structure and Controversy: What Names Authorities Adjudicate

Abstract

Abstract

To deal with proposals for new placenames and to arbitrate disputes over existing names, state names agencies have adopted a variety of methods and structures, ranging from large committees to individuals, to make recommendations to the Domestic Names Committee of the United States Board on Geographic Names. These authorities have often found themselves involved in controversy. In recent years the concern has been over the use of derogatory names, especially names containing the word “squaw,” and states have approached this problem in various ways. Of longer standing concern are commemorative names, and authorities have to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of naming features on the landscape for individuals.