Vol. 57 No. 4 (2009)
Research Article

Naming Differences in Divided Germany

Published 2009-12-01

Keywords

  • CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH,
  • CHARLES I (GREAT BRITAIN),
  • NEW ENGLAND,
  • CARTOGRAPHY,
  • COLONIZATION,
  • PROMOTIONAL PROPAGANDA
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

Abstract

This article analyzes differences in naming between East and West Germany. After World War II, Germany was split by the allied forces. Two Germanies emerged: the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The country's division lasted about forty years (1949–1989), a time span in which vastly different geo-political frameworks — Eastern bloc versus Western bloc — shaped people's lives and eventually their name choices as well. The results of this complex relationship are addressed here with the following questions: to what extent can different naming patterns and name preferences be observed in the two parts of divided Germany, regardless of their common language and cultural heritage? Can differences in taste be identified, and how did these differences develop over time? These questions are answered here using the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). The SOEP offers the rare opportunity of examining patterns of occurrence of first names among a representative sample of 56,000 individuals born since 1900. Moreover, this study includes a wide range of variables revealing the social and economic backgrounds of the “name givers”: the parents.

References

  1. Arai, Mahmood, Peter Skogman Thoursie and Anna Thoursie. 2004. “Changing Family Names: Discrimination or Assimilation.” Unpublished paper presented at the Harvard University Inequality Summer Institute.
  2. Aura, Saku and Gregory D. Hess. 2004. “What’s In A Name?” CESifo Working Paper No. 1190.
  3. Baayen, R. Harald. 2001. Word Frequency Distributions. Dordtrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Besnard, Philippe and Guy Desplanques. 2001. “Temporal Stratification of Taste: the Social Diffusion of First Names.” Revue française de sociologie 2001(42): 65–77.
  5. Bertrand, Marianne and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2003. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Latisha and Jamal? A Filed Experiment Evidence on Labour Market Discrimination.” NBER Working Paper No. 9873.
  6. Bird, Edward J., Joachim R. Frick and Gert G. Wagner. 1998. “The Income of Socialist Upper Classes During the Transition to Capitalism — Evidence From Longitudinal East German Data.” Journal of Comparative Economics 26(2): 211–225.
  7. Duden. 2004. Lexikon der Vornamen 2004. Dudenverlag: Mannheim.
  8. Eshel, Amram. 2001. “On the Frequency Distribution of First Names.” Names: A Journal of Onomastics 49(1): 55–60.
  9. Fryer, Roland G. Jr and Steven D. Levitt. 2004. “The Causes and Consequences Of Distinctively Black Names.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXIX(3): 767–803.
  10. Galbi, Douglas A. 2001. “A New Account of Personalization and Effective Communication.” <http://www.galbithink.org> [November 2003].
  11. Galbi, Douglas A. 2002. “Long-Term Trends in Personal Given Name Frequencies in the UK.” <http://www.galbithink.org/names/agnames.htm> [August 2005].
  12. Gerhards, Jürgen. 2003. Die Moderne und ihre Vornamen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  13. Gerhards, Jürgen. 2005. The Name Game. Transaction Publishers.
  14. Gerhards, Jürgen and Rolf Hackenbroch. 2000. “Trends and Causes of Cultural Modernization. An Empircial Study of First Names.” International Sociology 15: 501–532.
  15. Hanks, Patrick and Ken Tucker. 2000. “A Diagnostic Database of American Personal Names.” Names: A Journal of Onomastics 48: 59–69.
  16. Huschka, Denis and Gert G. Wagner. 2005. “Measuring Social Change — On the Frequency Distribution of Given Names in Germany since 1920”. Unpublished Paper presented at the “XLIV Names Institute” at the Weissman School of Arts and Sciences, May 2005, Baruch College, City University of New York, USA.
  17. Huschka, Denis, Jürgen Gerhards and Gert G. Wagner. 2005. Messung und Analyse des sozialen Wandels anhand der Vergabe von Vornamen: Aufbereitung und Auswertung des SOEP — Dokumentation der Datenbasis und der Vercodung, Berlin <http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~gerhards/english/proj_given_names.html>
  18. Lieberson, Stanley. 2000. A Matter of TasteiHow Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  19. Lieberson, Stanley and Eleanor O. Bell. 1992 “Children’s First Names: An Empirical Study of Social Taste.” American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 511–554.
  20. Linke, Norbert. 1987. “Die Rezeption der Programme von ARD und ZDF in der DDR als Gegenstand der SED-Kommunikationspolitik.” Publizistik 32: 45–68.
  21. Schupp, Jürgen and Gert G. Wagner. 2002. “Maintenance of and Innovation in Long-term Panel Studies The Case of the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP).” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 86(2): 163–175.
  22. Tucker, D. K. 2001. “Distribution of Forenames, Surnames, and Forename-Surename Pairs in the United States.” Names: A Journal of Onomastics 49(2): 69–96.
  23. Wagner, Gert G., Richard Burkhauser and Friederike Behringer. 1993. “The English Language Public Use File of the German Socio-Economic Panel.” The Journal of Human Resources 28(2): 429–433.
  24. Wolffson, Michael and Thomas Brechenmacher. 1999. Die Deutschen und ihre Vornamen. 200 Jahre Politik und öffentliche Meinung. Munich und Zurich: Diana.