Vol. 65 No. 3 (2017)
Article

Names, Grades, and Metamorphosis: A Small-Scale Socio-onomastic Investigation into the Effects of Ethnicity and Gender-Marked Personal Names on the Pedagogical Assessments of a Grade School Essay

PDF
  • I. M. Nick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2017.1304100

Published 2017-07-03

Keywords

  • pet-naming practices,
  • terms of endearment,
  • Chinese,
  • onomastics

Copyright (c) 2017 American Name Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this small-scale, mixed-method investigation, the potential presence of school teacher and teacher trainees’ name-based biases in reaction to schoolchildren’s first names was investigated in two experiments. In the first, German school teachers were asked to qualitatively and quantitatively assess an authentic literary essay written by a monolingual native-speaking German schoolchild. To test for possible name biases, three nearly identical versions of the essay were prepared. The only difference between them was the first names of the child listed as having authored the essay (Uwe, Achilleas, and Mustafa). In the second experiment, the set of personal names was expanded to include female first names (i.e. Heike, Athena, and Fatma) and the study participants were volunteer teacher trainees. In both experiments, evidence for covert name biases was identified. On the basis of these and other findings, the article concludes with concrete suggestions for future research. Chief among these recommendations is a call for more collaborative action research between university faculty and students.

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed, A., L. Andersson, and M. Hammarstedt. 2010. Can discrimination in the housing market be reduced by increasing the information about the applicants. Land Economics 86, no. 1: 79–90.10.3368/le.86.1.79
  2. Allen, L., V. Brown, L. Dickinson, and K. Pratt. 1941. The relation of first name preferences to their frequency in the culture. Journal of Social Psychology 14, no. 2: 279–293.10.1080/00224545.1941.9918770
  3. Anderson, K. 2010. Benign bigotry: The psychology of subtle prejudice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Anderson-Clark, T., R. Green, and T. Henley. 2008. The relationship between first names and teacher expectations for achievement motivation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27, no. 1: 94–99.10.1177/0261927X07309514
  5. Anderson, L., N. Jakobsson, and A. Kotsadam. 2012. A field experiment of discrimination in the norwegian housing marker: Gender, class, and ethnicity. Land Economics 88, no. 2: 233–240.10.3368/le.88.2.233
  6. Baert, S., B. Cockx, N. Gheyle, and C. Vandamme. 2015. Is there less discrimination in occupations where recruitment is difficult? ILR Review 68, no. 3: 467–500.10.1177/0019793915570873
  7. Baird, J. 1998. What’s in name? Experiments with blind marking in a-level examinations. Educational Research 40, no. 2: 191–202.10.1080/0013188980400207
  8. Bauman, J. 1996. Conflict or compatibility in classroom inquiry? One teacher’s struggle to balance teaching and research. Educational Researcher 25, no. 7: 29–36.
  9. van der Bergh, L., E. Denessen, L. Hornstra, M. Voeten, and R. Holland. 2010. The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal 47, no. 2: 497–527.10.3102/0002831209353594
  10. Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94, no. 4: 991–1013.10.1257/0002828042002561
  11. Booth, A., and A. Leigh. 2010. Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations. Economic Letters 107, no. 2: 236–238.10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.034
  12. Bosch, M., M. Carnero, and L. Farré. 2010. Information and discrimination in the rental housing market: Evidence from a field experiment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40, no. 1: 11–19.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.11.001
  13. Busse, T., and L. Seeaydarian. 1979. First Names and Popularity in Grade School Children. Psychology in the Schools 16, no. 1: 149–153.
  14. Carpusor, A., and W. Loges. 2006. Rental discrimination and ethnicity in names. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36, no. 4: 934–952.10.1111/jasp.2006.36.issue-4
  15. Conaway, W., and S. Bethune. 2015. Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction? Online Learning Journal 19, no. 3: 162–178.
  16. Cotton, J., B. O’Neill, and A. Griffin, A. 2008. The ‘name game’: Affective and hiring reactions to first names. Journal of Managerial Psychology 23, no. 1: 18–39.10.1108/02683940810849648
  17. Crisp, D., R. Apostal, and H. Luessenheide. 1984. The relationship of frequency and social desirability of first names with academic and sex role variables. Journal of Social Psychology 123, no. 1: 143–144.10.1080/00224545.1984.9924527
  18. Derous, E., H. Nguyen, and A. Ryan. 2009. Hiring discrimination against arab minorities: Interactions between prejudice and job characteristics. Human Performance 22, no. 4: 297–320.10.1080/08959280903120261
  19. Destatis. 2013. Female earnings-male earnings: How wide is the gap really? https://www.destatis.de/EN/Publications/STATmagazin/EarningsLabourCosts/2013_03/2013_03GenderPayGap.html (accessed May 31, 2016).
  20. Destatis. 2014. Proportion of women: Academic career. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/EducationResearchCulture/Ins.html (accessed June 7, 2016).
  21. Dhami, M. 2003. Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychological Science 14, no. 2: 175–180.10.1111/psci.2003.14.issue-2
  22. Erwin, P. 1993. First names and perceptions of physical attractiveness. The Journal of Psychology 127, no. 6: 625–631.
  23. Erwin, P., and A. Caley. 2011. The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children’s essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology 54, no. 2: 223–227.
  24. van Ewijk, R. 2011. Same work, lower grade? Student ethnicity and teachers’ subjective assessments. Economics of Education Review 30, no. 5: 1045–1058.10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.008
  25. Feldman, M., and A. Weseley. 2013. Which name unlocks the door? The effect of tenant race/ethnicity on landlord response. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43, no. S2: E416–E425.10.1111/jasp.2013.43.issue-s2
  26. Ford, M., I. Miura, and J. Masters. 1984. Effects of social stimulus value on academic achievement and social competence: A reconsideration of children's first-name characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 6: 1149–1158.10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1149
  27. Gaddis, S., and R. Ghoshal. 2015. Arab American housing discrimination, ethnic competition, and the contact hypothesis. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 660, no. 1: 282–299.10.1177/0002716215580095
  28. Gamaroff, R. 2000. Rater reliability in language assessment: The bug of all bears. System 28, no. 1: 31–53.10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00059-7
  29. Garwood, S. 1976. First-name stereotypes as a factor in self-concept and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 68, no. 4: 482–487.10.1037/0022-0663.68.4.482
  30. Garwood, S., L. Cox, V. Kaplan, N. Wasserman, and J. Sulzer. 1980. Beauty in only ‘name’ deep: The effect of first-name on ratings of physical attraction. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology 10, no. 5: 431–435.10.1111/jasp.1980.10.issue-5
  31. Gebauer, J., M. Leary, and W. Neberich. 2011. Unfortunate first names: Effects of name-based relational devaluation and interpersonal neglect. Social Psychology and Personality Science 3, no. 5: 590–596.
  32. Gigerenzer, G., and W. Gaissmaier. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62: 451–482.10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
  33. Goldstein, J., and G. Stecklov. 2016. From Patrick to John F.: Ethnic names and occupational success in the last era of migration. American Sociological Review 81, no. 1: 85–106.10.1177/0003122415621910
  34. Greenwald, A., D. McGhee, and J. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual difference in implicit cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, no. 6: 1464–1480.10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  35. Hanson, A., and Z. Hawley. 2011. Do landlords discriminate in the rental housing market? Evidence from an internet field experiment in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics 70, no. 2: 99–114.10.1016/j.jue.2011.02.003
  36. Harari, H., and J. McDavid. 1973. Name stereotypes and teachers' expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology 65, no. 2: 222–225.10.1037/h0034978
  37. Hine, G. 2013. The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research 23, no. 2: 151–163.
  38. Hong, J., H. Chick, and J. Moss. 2007. Classroom researcher as teacher-researcher. The Mathematics Educator 10, no. 2: 1–26.
  39. Jae, H., and J. Cowling. 2009. Objectivity in grading: The promise of bar codes. College Teaching 57, no. 1: 51–55.10.3200/CTCH.57.1.51-55
  40. Joubert, C. 1983. Unusual names and academic achievement. Psychological Reports 53, no. 1: 266.10.2466/pr0.1983.53.1.266
  41. Joubert, C. 1999. Correlates of preferences for personal names with neo five factor inventory. Psychological Reports 84, no. 2: 575–581.10.2466/pr0.1999.84.2.575
  42. Kaiser, Astrid. 2010. Vornamen: Nomen est omen? Vorerwartungen und Vorurteile in der Grundschule. Schulverwaltung. Zeitschrift für Schulleitung und Schulaufsicht 21, no. 2: 58–59.
  43. Laversuch, I. 2011. Multiple language, variation, variety and use. Aachen: Shaker.
  44. Levin, M., and D. Greenwood. 2001. Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In Handbook of action research, eds. P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 103–113. London: Sage.
  45. Lloyd, M. 2013. Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, no. 4: 539–543.
  46. McDavid, J., and H. Harari. 1966. Stereotyping of names and popularity in grade-school children. Child Development 37, no. 2: 453–459.10.2307/1126818
  47. Mehrabian, A. 1992. Interrelationships among name desirability, name uniqueness, emotional characteristics connoted by names and temperament. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22, no. 23: 1797–1798.10.1111/jasp.1992.22.issue-23
  48. Mehrabian, A., and M. Piercy. 1992. Positive or negative connotations of unconventionally and conventionally spelled names. The Journal of Social Psychology 133, no. 4: 445–451.
  49. Mehrabian, A., and P. Valdez. 1990. Basic name connotations and related sex stereotyping. Psychological Reports 66, no. 3: 1309–1310.10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3c.1309
  50. Moss-Racusin, C., J. Dovidio, V. Brescoll, M. Graham, and J. Handelsman. 2012. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109, no. 41: 16474–16479.10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  51. Paludi, M., and L. Strayer. 1985. What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name. Sex Roles 12, no. 3/4: 353–361.10.1007/BF00287601
  52. Pascual, A., N. Guéguen, B. Vallée, M. Lourel, and O. Cosnefroy. 2015. First name popularity as a predictor of employability. Names 63, no. 1: 30–36.10.1179/0027773814Z.00000000091
  53. Peterson, T., K. Van Dam, and L. Wheeler. 2009. Who do we think we are. In Proceedings of World Conference on E Learning in Corporations, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, eds. T. Bastiaens, J. Dron and C. Xin, 2227–2237. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  54. Rooth, D. 2010. Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labor Economics 17, no. 3: 523–534.10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005
  55. Savage, B., and F. Wells. 1948. A note on singularity in given names. Journal of Social Psychology 27, no. 2: 271–272.10.1080/00224545.1948.9918930
  56. Silberzahn, R., and E. Uhlmann. 2013. It pays to be Herr Kaiser: Germans with noble-sounding surnames more often work as managers than as employees. Psychological Science 24, no. 12: 2437–2444.10.1177/0956797613494851
  57. Sprietsma, M. 2009. Discrimination in grading? Experimental evidence from primary school. Discussion Paper No.: 09–074. ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research.
  58. Sprietsma, M. 2013. Discrimination in grading: Experimental evidence from primary school teachers. Empirical Economics 45, no. 1: 523–538.10.1007/s00181-012-0609-x
  59. Sprietsma, M. 2009. Discrimination in grading? Experimental evidence from primary school. Discussion Paper No.: 09–074. ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research.
  60. Steinpreis, R., K. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles 41, no. 7: 509–528.10.1023/A:1018839203698
  61. Takiff, H., D. Sanchez, and T. Stewart. 2001. What's in a name? The status implications of students' terms of address for male and female professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly 25, no. 2: 134–144.10.1111/1471-6402.00015
  62. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  63. West, S., and T. Shults. 1976. Liking for common and uncommon first names. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2, no. 3: 299–302.10.1177/014616727600200320
  64. Widner, D., and S. Chicoine. 2011. It’s all in the name: Employment discrimination against Arab Americans. Sociological Forum 26, no. 4: 806–823.10.1111/socf.2011.26.issue-4
  65. Wilson, S. 1995. Not tension but intention: A response to wong’s analysis of researcher/teacher. Educational Researcher 24, no. 8: 19–22.10.3102/0013189X024008019
  66. Zick, A., B. Küpper, and A. Hövermann. 2011. Intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination: A European report. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.