Vol. 62 No. 4 (2014)
Research Article

Alphabetical Effects on Political Careers

PDF
  • R. Urbatsch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773814Z.00000000093

Published 2014-12-01

Keywords

  • Indigenous Knowledge,
  • origin of humankind,
  • name-giving conventions,
  • Xhosa,
  • embedded tradition,
  • creativity
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2014 Maney Publishing

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Abstract

Personal names have important consequences for many life outcomes, but their influence on political success is relatively unexplored. Yet widespread biases towards outcomes early in the alphabet and the propensity for some seniority lists (such as those in the United States House of Representatives) to privilege alphabetical position when politicians assume office simultaneously suggest that alphabetically early surnames may promote electoral success. Examining American governors and members of the federal Congress reveals that prominent elected politicians are, on average, earlier alphabetically than their average constituent. Furthermore, members of the House of Representatives are more likely to assume party leadership positions when they are earlier in alphabetical order, whereas members of the Senate (where alphabetical position plays no role in determining seniority) show no such relationship.

PDF

References

  1. Bagley, C.R. 1965. “Does Candidates’ Position on the Ballot Paper Influence Voters’ Choice? A Study of the 1959 and 1964 British General Elections.” Parliamentary Affairs 19(2): 162–174.
  2. Bakker, Eric A., and Arend Lijphart. 1980. “A Crucial Test of Alphabetic Voting: The Elections at the University of Leiden, 1973–1978.” British Journal of Political Science 10(4): 521–525.
  3. Brockington, David. 2003. “A Low-Information Theory of Ballot Position Effect.” Political Behavior 25(1): 1–27.
  4. Burden, Barry C. 2002. “United States Senators as Presidential Candidates.” Political Science Quarterly 117(1): 81–102.
  5. Crook, Sara Brandes, and John R. Hibbing. 1985. “Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the US House of Representatives.” British Journal of Political Science 15(2): 207–226.
  6. Dean, Michael L. 1982. “Alphabetic Notation Bias in Blind Test Research.” Journal of Psychology 111(2): 269–271.
  7. Denord, François, Johs. Hjellbrekke, Olav Korsnes, Frédéric Lebaron, and Brigitte Le Roux. 2011. “Social Capital in the Field of Power: The Case of Norway.” Sociological Review 59(1): 86–108.
  8. Grannis, Shaun J., J. Marc Overhage, and Clement J. McDonald. 2002. “Analysis of Identifier Performance Using a Deterministic Linkage Algorithm.” Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium: 305–309.
  9. Hodson, Gordon, and James M. Olson. 2005. “Testing the Generality of the Name Letter Effect: Name Initials and Everyday Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(8): 1099–1111.
  10. Johnson, Andrew J., and Chris Miles. 2011. “Order Effects of Ballot Position without Information-Induced Confirmatory Bias.” British Politics 6(4): 479–490.
  11. Jurajda, Štěpán, and Daniel Münich. 2010. “Admission to Selective Schools, Alphabetically.” Economics of Education Review 29(6): 1100–1109.
  12. Kalist, David E., and Daniel Y. Lee. 2009. “First Names and Crime: Does Unpopularity Spell Trouble?” Social Science Quarterly 90(1): 39–49.
  13. Kanthak, Kristin. 2011. “The Hidden Effects of Rules Not Broken: Career Paths, Institutional Rules and Anticipatory Exit in Legislatures.” British Journal of Political Science 41(4): 841–857.
  14. Kellermann, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 2009. “Congressional Careers, Committee Assignments, and Seniority Randomization in the US House of Representatives.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(2): 87–101.
  15. Kelley, Jonathan, and Ian McAllister. 1984. “Ballot Paper Cues and the Vote in Australia and Britain: Alphabetic Voting, Sex, and Title.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48(2): 452–466.
  16. Laham, Simon M., Peter Koval, and Adam L. Alter. 2012. “The Name-Pronunciation Effect: Why People Like Mr Smith More Than Mr Colquhoun.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(3): 752–756.
  17. Levitt, Jonathan M., and Mike Thelwall. 2013. “Alphabetization and the Skewing of First Authorship towards Last Names Early in the Alphabet.” Journal of Informetrics 7(3): 575–582.
  18. Lijphart, Arend, and Rafael López Pintor. 1988. “Alphabetic Bias in Partisan Elections: Patterns of Voting for the Spanish Senate, 1982 and 1986.” Electoral Studies 7(3): 225–231.
  19. Meer, Jonathan, and Harvey S. Rosen. 2011. “The ABCs of Charitable Solicitation.” Journal of Public Economics 95(5–6): 363–371.
  20. Mehrabian, Albert. 2001. “Characteristics Attributed to Individuals on the Basis of Their First Names.” Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 127(1): 59–88.
  21. Meredith, Marc, and Yuval Salant. 2013. “On the Causes and Consequences of Ballot Order Effects.” Political Behavior 35(1): 175–197.
  22. Merritt, Deborah J. 1999. “Calling Professor AAA: How to Visit at the School of Your Choice.” Journal of Legal Education 49(4): 557–563.
  23. Miquel, Gerard Padro I., and James M. Snyder, Jr. 2006. “Legislative Effectiveness and Legislative Careers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(3): 347–381.
  24. Norman-Eady, Sandra. 2006. “Ballot Positions.” Office of Legislative Research, Research Report 2006-R-0801.
  25. Oliver, J. Eric, Thomas Wood, and Alexandra Bass. 2013. “Liberellas versus Konservatives: Social Status, Ideology, and Birth Names in the United States.” Paper presented at the Midwestern Political Science Association annual meeting.
  26. O’Sullivan, Chris S., Audrey Chen, Simani Mohapatra, Lee Sigelman, and Erik Lewis. 1988. “Voting in Ignorance: The Politics of Smooth-Sounding Names.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18(13): 1094–1106.
  27. Richardson, Michael L. 2008. “Alphabetic Bias in the Selection of Reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.” American Journal of Roentgenology 191(6): W213–W216.
  28. Ring, Erp. 1980. “Is There Really a Connection Between the Initial Letter of a Person’s Surname and his Career?” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 9 (3): 285–289.
  29. Singh, Rajiv, Alistair Philip, Stephen Smith, and Brian Pentland. 2006. “Alphabetical Prejudice in Team Discussions (Or: Would Zebedee Ever Get Seen on a Ward Round?).” Disability and Rehabilitation 28(20): 1299–1300.
  30. Smith, Grant W. 1998. “The Political Impact of Name Sounds.” Communication Monographs 65(20): 154–172.
  31. Smith, Grant W. 2007. “The Influence of Name Sounds in the Congressional Elections of 2006.” Names 55(4): 465–472.
  32. van der Hulst, Marc. 2000. The Parliamentary Mandate: A Global Comparative Study. Geneva: Inter- Parliamentary Union.
  33. van Praag, C. Mirjam, and Bernard M. S. van Praag. 2008. “The Benefits of Being Economics Professor A (rather than Z).” Economica 75(300): 782–796.
  34. Wattenberg, Martin, and Fernanda Viégas. 2010. “Beautiful History: Visualizing Wikipedia.” Beautiful Visualization: Looking at Data through the Eyes of Experts. Ed. Julie Steele and Noah Iliinsky. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 175–192.
  35. Webber, Richard, Colin Rallings, Galina Borisyuk, and Michael Thrasher. 2014. “Ballot Order Positional Effects in British Local Elections, 1973–2011.” Parliamentary Affairs 67(1): 119–136.
  36. Wood, Jo, Donia Badawood, Jason Dykes, and Aidan Slingsby. 2011. “BallotMaps: Detecting Name Bias in Alphabetically Ordered Ballot Papers.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17(12): 2384–2391.
  37. Word, David L., Charles D. Coleman, Robert Nunziata, and Robert Kominski. 2007. “Demographic Aspects of Surnames from Census 2000.” Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.