Vol. 49 No. 4 (2001)
Research Article

Onomastics and the Academy: Past, Present, and Future

PDF
  • Thomas E. Murray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2001.49.4.215

Published 2001-12-01

Copyright (c) 2001 Maney

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

PDF

References

  1. Bryant, Margaret M. 1976. “After 25 Years of Onomastic Study.” Names 24: 30–55.
  2. Lieberson, Stanley, Susan Dumais, and Shy on Baumann. 2000. “The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 1249–87.
  3. Lieberson, Stanley, and Kelly S. Mikelson. 1995. “Distinctive African American Names: An Experimental, Historical, and Linguistic Analysis of Innovation. ” American Sociological Review 60: 928–46.
  4. Murray, Thomas E. 1994. “On the Need to Legitimize Onomastics in Academia.” Names 42: 67–78.
  5. Murray, Thomas E. 1997a. “Attitudes Toward Married Women’s Surnames: Evidence from the American Midwest.” Names 45: 163–83.
  6. Murray, Thomas E. 1997b. “Perceptions of Ms.-titled Women: Evidence from the American Midwest.” Onomastica Canadiana 79: 73–96.
  7. Smith, Grant. 1997. “School Team Names in Washington State.” American Speech 72: 172–82.